Volume 45 Issue 1
Jan.  2026
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
WANG Yunquan,CHEN Siyuan,QI Pengfei. Simulation of soil water transport considering the effects of soil structure and adsorption forces[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology,2026,45(1):272-278 doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20240286
Citation: WANG Yunquan,CHEN Siyuan,QI Pengfei. Simulation of soil water transport considering the effects of soil structure and adsorption forces[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology,2026,45(1):272-278 doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20240286

Simulation of soil water transport considering the effects of soil structure and adsorption forces

doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20240286
More Information
  • Corresponding author: E-mail:wangyq@cug.edu.cn
  • Received Date: 28 May 2024
  • Accepted Date: 24 Oct 2024
  • Rev Recd Date: 24 Oct 2024
  • Available Online: 17 Dec 2025
  • Objective

    Traditional soil hydraulic models based on capillarity theory, poorly characterize soil structure (e.g., soil macropores) and adsorption forces, which limits their ability to accurately describe soil hydraulic properties under near-saturation and low soil water content conditions. Consequently, these models struggle to accurately simulate soil water movement.

    Methods

    In this study, we evaluated the performance of different soil hydraulic characteristic models using continuous field-measured soil moisture data from seven FLUXNET sites. We employed the FXW-M3 model, which accounts for soil structure, adsorption, and capillary forces, and the VGM model, which considers only capillary forces. Using the improved HYDRUS-1D software, we simulated and analyzed site-specific soil moisture data.

    Results

    The results indicated that the FXW-M3 model significantly improved the accuracy of soil water movement simulation. The average root mean square error (RMSE) for the FXW-M3 model was 0.0048 cm3/cm3, which was lower than the 0.0113 cm3/cm3 for the VGM model. The average R for the FXW-M3 model was 0.80, which was higher than 0.75 for the VGM model.

    Conclusion

    These results highlighted the significant impact of soil structure and adsorption forces on soil water movement.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    VEREECKEN H, HUISMAN J A, PACHEPSKY Y, et al. On the spatio-temporal dynamics of soil moisture at the field scale[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2014, 516: 76-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.11.061
    [2]
    RICHARDS L A. Capillary conduction of liquids through porous mediums[J]. Physics, 1931, 1(5): 318-333. doi: 10.1063/1.1745010
    [3]
    MUALEM Y. A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media[J]. Water Resources Research, 1976, 12(3): 513-522. doi: 10.1029/WR012i003p00513
    [4]
    VAN GENUCHTEN M T. A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1980, 44(5): 892-898. doi: 10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x
    [5]
    MILLINGTON R J, QUIRK J P. Permeability of porous solids[J]. Transactions of the Faraday Society, 1961, 57: 1200-1207.
    [6]
    ORR F M, SCRIVEN L E, RIVAS A P. Pendular rings between solids: Meniscus properties and capillary force[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1975, 67(4): 723-742. doi: 10.1017/S0022112075000572
    [7]
    TOKUNAGA T K. Hydraulic properties of adsorbed water films in unsaturated porous media[J]. Water Resources Research, 2009, 45(6): 1-9.
    [8]
    ROSSI C, NIMMO J R. Modeling of soil water retention from saturation to oven dryness[J]. Water Resources Research, 1994, 30(3): 701-708. doi: 10.1029/93WR03238
    [9]
    NIMMO J R. Comment on the treatment of residual water content in "a consistent set of parametric models for the two-phase flow of immiscible fluids in the subsurface" by L. Luckner et al[J]. Water Resources Research, 1991, 27(4): 661-662. doi: 10.1029/91WR00165
    [10]
    TULLER M, OR D. Hydraulic conductivity of variably saturated porous media: Film and corner flow in angular pore space[J]. Water Resources Research, 2001, 37(5): 1257-1276.
    [11]
    LEBEAU M, KONRAD J M. A new capillary and thin film flow model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media[J]. Water Resources Research, 2010, 46(12): 1-15.
    [12]
    WANG Y Q, MA J Z, ZHANG Y L, et al. A new theoretical model accounting for film flow in unsaturated porous media[J]. Water Resources Research, 2013, 49(8): 5021-5028. doi: 10.1002/wrcr.20390
    [13]
    ZHANG Z F. Soil water retention and relative permeability for conditions from oven-dry to full saturation[J]. Vadose Zone Journal, 2011, 10(4): 1299-1308. doi: 10.2136/vzj2011.0019
    [14]
    TULLER M, OR D, DUDLEY L M. Adsorption and capillary condensation in porous media: Liquid retention and interfacial configurations in angular pores[J]. Water Resources Research, 1999, 35(7): 1949-1964. doi: 10.1029/1999WR900098
    [15]
    NIMMO J R. Modeling structural influences on soil water retention[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 1997, 61(3): 712-719.
    [16]
    VAN GENUCHTEN M T, NIELSEN D R. On describing and predicting the hydraulic properties[C]//Anon. Annales Geophysicae. [S.l.]: [S.n.], 1985, 3(5): 615-628.
    [17]
    SCHAAP M G, LEIJ F J. Improved prediction of unsaturated hydraulic conductivity with the mualem-van genuchten model[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2000, 64(3): 843-851. doi: 10.2136/sssaj2000.643843x
    [18]
    SCHAAP M G, LEIJ F J, VAN GENUCHTEN M T. Rosetta: A computer program for estimating soil hydraulic parameters with hierarchical pedotransfer functions[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2001, 251(3/4): 163-176.
    [19]
    GERKE H H. Preferential flow descriptions for structured soils[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 2006, 169(3): 382-400. doi: 10.1002/jpln.200521955
    [20]
    JARVIS N J. A review of non-equilibrium water flow and solute transport in soil macropores: Principles, controlling factors and consequences for water quality[J]. European Journal of Soil Science, 2007, 58(3): 523-546. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2007.00915.x
    [21]
    SILVA O, GRIFOLL J. A soil-water retention function that includes the hyper-dry region through the BET adsorption isotherm[J]. Water Resources Research, 2007, 43(11): 1-13.
    [22]
    WANG Y Q, JIN M G, DENG Z J. Alternative model for predicting soil hydraulic conductivity over the complete moisture range[J]. Water Resources Research, 2018, 54(9): 6860-6876. doi: 10.1029/2018WR023037
    [23]
    WANG Y Q, MA R, ZHU G F. Improved prediction of hydraulic conductivity with a soil water retention curve that accounts for both capillary and adsorption forces[J]. Water Resources Research, 2022, 58(4): 1-22.
    [24]
    LIAO K H, LAI X M, ZHOU Z W, et al. A simple and improved model for describing soil hydraulic properties from saturation to oven dryness[J]. Vadose Zone Journal, 2018, 17(1): 180082.
    [25]
    YANG Z L, LI Z, TONG X, et al. Weibull distribution models for describing soil hydraulic properties over the entire matric suction range[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2023, 622: 129661. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129661
    [26]
    PETERS A, HOHENBRINK T L, IDEN S C, et al. Prediction of the absolute hydraulic conductivity function from soil water retention data[J]. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2023, 27(7): 1565-1582. doi: 10.5194/hess-27-1565-2023
    [27]
    ZHANG Y G, WEIHERMÜLLER L, TOTH B, et al. Analyzing dual porosity in soil hydraulic properties using soil databases for pedotransfer function development[J]. Vadose Zone Journal, 2022, 21(5): e20227. doi: 10.1002/vzj2.20227
    [28]
    DURNER W, DIAMANTOPOULOS E, IDEN S C, et al. Hydraulic properties and non-equilibrium water flow in soils[M]. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2014: 403-434.
    [29]
    DEXTER A R. Advances in characterization of soil structure[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 1988, 11(3/4): 199-238.
    [30]
    VAN GENUCHTEN M T, NIELSEN D R. On describing and predicting the hydraulic properties of unsaturated soils[J]. Annales Geophysicae, 1985, 3: 615-627.
    [31]
    FATICHI S, OR D, WALKO R, et al. Soil structure is an important omission in earth system models[J]. Nature Communications, 2020, 11: 522. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-14411-z
    [32]
    WANG Y Q, MA R, ZHU G F. Representation of the influence of soil structure on hydraulic conductivity prediction[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2023, 619: 129330. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129330
    [33]
    FREDLUND D G, XING A Q. Equations for the soil-water characteristic curve[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1994, 31(4): 521-532. doi: 10.1139/t94-061
    [34]
    ŠIMŮNEK J, VAN GENUCHTEN M T, ŠEJNA M. Recent developments and applications of the HYDRUS computer software packages[J]. Vadose Zone Journal, 2016, 15(7).
    [35]
    DUAN Q Y, SOROOSHIAN S, GUPTA V. Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall-runoff models[J]. Water Resources Research, 1992, 28(4): 1015-1031. doi: 10.1029/91WR02985
    [36]
    POLLACCO J A P, NASTA P, SORIA-UGALDE J M, et al. Reduction of feasible parameter space of the inverted soil hydraulic parameter sets for kosugi model[J]. Soil Science, 2013, 178(6): 267-280. doi: 10.1097/SS.0b013e3182a2da21
    [37]
    王兴华, 李小倩, 谢晓涵, 等. 土壤因子对三氯乙烯土−气分配系数的影响[J]. 地质科技通报, 2024, 43(5): 272-278. doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20240028

    WANG X H, LI X Q, XIE X H, et al. Impact of soil factors on soil-gas partition coefficient of trichloroethylene[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2024, 43(5): 272-278. (in Chinese with English abstract doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20240028
    [38]
    王铭森, 邓斌, 张晚祺, 等. 非均质包气带土壤含水率分布定量刻画及其模拟[J]. 地质科技通报, 2025, 44(3): 296-308. doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20240256

    WANG M S, DENG B, ZHANG W Q, et al. Quantitative characterization and simulation of soil moisture distribution in heterogeneous vadose zone[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2025, 44(3): 296-308. (in Chinese with English abstract doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20240256
    [39]
    金玉, 陈文岭, 王铭森, 等. 基于露点水势仪与滤纸法的盐渍土蒸发过程中吸力动态规律[J]. 地质科技通报, 2025, 44(6): 270-280. doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20240065

    JIN Y, CHEN W L, WANG M S, et al. Dynamic law of suction during the evaporation process of saline soil based on dew point water potential meter and filter paper method[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2025, 44(6): 270-280. (in Chinese with English abstract doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20240065
    [40]
    李培月, 李佳慧, 吴健华, 等. 黄土−古土壤互层对土壤水分运移及土体微结构的影响[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2024, 51(3): 1-11.

    LI P Y, LI J H, WU J H, et al. Effects of loess-paleosol interbedding on soil moisture transport and soil microstructure[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2024, 51(3): 1-11.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article Views(25) PDF Downloads(8) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return