Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
LI Peng,LI Hangzhe,YANG Chao,et al. Numerical simulation on heat transfer performance of coaxical borehole heat exchanger[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology,2025,44(6):1-11 doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20240032
Citation: LI Peng,LI Hangzhe,YANG Chao,et al. Numerical simulation on heat transfer performance of coaxical borehole heat exchanger[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology,2025,44(6):1-11 doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20240032

Numerical simulation on heat transfer performance of coaxical borehole heat exchanger

doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20240032
More Information
  • Objective

    Shallow geothermal energy is a clean and stable renewable energy source. Ground-coupled heat pumps represents are a commonly used technology for developing and utilizing shallow geothermal energy in building heating and cooling systems. This technology extracts heat from the subsurface without pumping groundwater; thus causing minimal disturbance to the underground environment. The borehole heat exchanger serves as the primary component of heat exchange in ground-coupled heat pump systems, with the U-shaped configuration being the most prevalent. However, research and application of coaxial borehole heat exchangers in shallow geothermal energy remain relatively limited.

    Methods

    his study focuses on the shallow coaxial borehole heat exchanger and conducts numerical simulations to investigate their heat transfer performance, analyze sensitivity factors, and compare their efficiency with that of a U-shaped borehole heat exchanger.

    Results

    The findings demonstrate that when traditional PE pipes are employed for both the inner and outer pipes of a coaxial borehole heat exchanger, thermal short-circuiting occurs between the annular fluid and the inner pipe fluid, resulting in a 23% reduction in heat transfer efficiency. The sensitivity factors influencing coaxial borehole heat exchangers performance are ranked as follows: Inlet temperature, initial soil temperature, circulating flow rate, thermal conductivity of casing and inner pipe materials, and thermal conductivity, backfill material. Under identical conditions, the U-shaped borehole heat exchanger exhibits an 8.57% higher heat transfer efficiency compared to coaxial borehole heat exchanges. However, when a coaxial borehole heat exchanger’s casing is constructed from steel and its inner pipe is insulated, its heat transfer efficiency exceeds that of the U-shaped borehole heat exchanger by 21.64%.

    Conclusion

    The research results can provide a reference for the research and application of shallow-buried pipe technology.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    GONG S. Research on ground source heat pump technology in China[J]. International Core Journal of Engineering, 2020, 6(3): 198-203.
    [2]
    LUO J, ROHN J, BAYER M, et al. Heating and cooling performance analysis of a ground source heat pump system in southern Germany[J]. Geothermics, 2015, 53: 57-66. doi: 10.1016/j.geothermics.2014.04.004
    [3]
    王亚超, 窦斌, 喻勇, 等. 不同冷却方式下高温花岗岩巴西劈裂及声发射特性试验研究[J]. 地质科技通报, 2022, 41(3): 200-207.

    WANG Y C, DOU B, YU Y, et al. Experimental study on Brazilian split test and acoustic emission characteristics of high temperature granite under different cooling methods[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2022, 41(3): 200-207. (in Chinese with English abstract
    [4]
    ZHANG L F, LUO X W, HUANG G S, et al. Comparative analysis of U-pipe location on the sizing of borehole heat exchangers[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2019, 150: 666-673. doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.01.017
    [5]
    ZHU Z N, TIAN H, JIANG G S, et al. Effects of high temperature on the mechanical properties of Chinese marble[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2018, 51(6): 1937-1942. doi: 10.1007/s00603-018-1426-0
    [6]
    段新胜, 顾湘, 李鹏, 等. 加热过程间断的热响应试验数据处理方法研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2018, 39(10): 2685-2690.

    DUAN X S, GU X, LI P, et al. Study on data processing method for thermal response test of discontinuous heating process[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2018, 39(10): 2685-2690. (in Chinese with English abstract
    [7]
    ARESTI L, CHRISTODOULIDES P, FLORIDES G. A review of the design aspects of ground heat exchangers[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018, 92: 757-773. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.053
    [8]
    LIU J, WANG F H, CAI W L, et al. Numerical study on the effects of design parameters on the heat transfer performance of coaxial deep borehole heat exchanger[J]. International Journal of Energy Research, 2019, 43(12): 6337-6352. doi: 10.1002/er.4357
    [9]
    林华颖, 裴鹏, 邹行, 等. 贵州省毕节市米底河地热特征及形成机理[J]. 地质科技通报, 2023, 42(3): 281-288.

    LIN H Y, PEI P, ZOU H, et al. Geothermal characteristics and formation mechanism of the Medi River in Bijie City, Guizhou Province[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2023, 42(3): 281-288. (in Chinese with English abstract
    [10]
    薛玉伟, 季民, 李新国, 等. 单U、双U型埋管换热器换热性能与经济性研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2006, 27(4): 410-414.

    XUE Y W, JI M, LI X G, et al. Heat performance research and economical analysis of single U shaped and double U shaped vertical borehole heat exchanger[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2006, 27(4): 410-414. (in Chinese with English abstract
    [11]
    DUUS K, SCHMITZ G. Experimental investigation of sustainable and energy efficient management of a geothermal field as a heat source and heat sink for a large office building[J]. Energy and Buildings, 2021, 235: 110726. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.110726
    [12]
    VIEIRA A, ALBERDI-PAGOLA M, CHRISTODOULIDES P, et al. Characterisation of ground thermal and thermo-mechanical behaviour for shallow geothermal energy applications[J]. Energies, 2017, 10(12): 2044. doi: 10.3390/en10122044
    [13]
    LUO J, ROHN J, XIANG W, et al. Experimental investigation of a borehole field by enhanced geothermal response test and numerical analysis of performance of the borehole heat exchangers[J]. Energy, 2015, 84: 473-484. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.03.013
    [14]
    WAGNER V, BAYER P, KÜBERT M, et al. Numerical sensitivity study of thermal response tests[J]. Renewable Energy, 2012, 41: 245-253. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2011.11.001
    [15]
    HU J Z. An improved analytical model for vertical borehole ground heat exchanger with multiple-layer substrates and groundwater flow[J]. Applied Energy, 2017, 202: 537-549. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.05.152
    [16]
    ZHANG X P, HAN Z W, JI Q, et al. Thermal response tests for the identification of soil thermal parameters: A review[J]. Renewable Energy, 2021, 173: 1123-1135. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.12.028
    [17]
    WANG H J, QI C Y, DU H P, et al. Thermal performance of borehole heat exchanger under groundwater flow: A case study from Baoding[J]. Energy and Buildings, 2009, 41(12): 1368-1373. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2009.08.001
    [18]
    LUO J, TUO J S, HUANG W, et al. Influence of groundwater levels on effective thermal conductivity of the ground and heat transfer rate of borehole heat exchangers[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2018, 128: 508-516. doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.08.148
    [19]
    ZHANG L L, ZHAO L, YANG L. Analyses on soil temperature responses to intermittent heat rejection from BHEs in soils with groundwater advection[J]. Energy and Buildings, 2015, 107: 355-365. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2015.08.040
    [20]
    HEFNI M A, XU M H, ZUETER A F, et al. A 3D space-marching analytical model for geothermal borehole systems with multiple heat exchangers[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2022, 216: 119027. doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2022.119027
    [21]
    PAN A Q, LU L, CUI P, et al. A new analytical heat transfer model for deep borehole heat exchangers with coaxial tubes[J]. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2019, 141: 1056-1065. doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.07.041
    [22]
    LUO Y Q, YU J H, YAN T, et al. Improved analytical modeling and system performance evaluation of deep coaxial borehole heat exchanger with segmented finite cylinder-source method[J]. Energy and Buildings, 2020, 212: 109829. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.109829
    [23]
    王硕, 黄可钦, 王胜蓝, 等. 同轴套管式深埋管换热器换热性能研究[J]. 制冷与空调, 2019, 19(4): 23-28.

    WANG S, HUANG K Q, WANG S L, et al. Research on heat transfer performance of coaxial double-pipe deep borehole heat exchanger[J]. Refrigeration and Air-Conditioning, 2019, 19(4): 23-28. (in Chinese with English abstract
    [24]
    王硕, 殷元生, 黄可钦, 等. 同轴套管深埋管换热器延米换热量变化规律的研究[J]. 工业加热, 2019, 48(2): 5-9.

    WANG S, YIN Y S, HUANG K Q, et al. Research on the change of heat transfer rate per meter in deep coaxial borehole heat exchanger[J]. Industrial Heating, 2019, 48(2): 5-9. (in Chinese with English abstract
    [25]
    张兵兵. 中深层套管式地埋管换热器与地源侧水系统能效研究[D]. 济南: 山东建筑大学, 2019.

    ZHANG B B. Study on energy efficiency of deep borehole casing type buried pipe heat exchanger and ground source side water system[D]. Jinan: Shandong Jianzhu University, 2019. (in Chinese with English abstract
    [26]
    李鹏程. 中深层地热源热泵套管式地埋管换热器传热特性研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨工业大学, 2018.

    LI P C. Research on heat transfer characteristics of casing ground heat exchanger with medium and deep ground source heat pump[D]. Harbin: Harbin Institute of Technology, 2018. (in Chinese with English abstract
    [27]
    谢宗标. 同轴深井套管式地埋管换热器岩土热物性实验分析研究[D]. 合肥: 安徽建筑大学, 2017.

    XIE Z B. Experimental study on geothermal properties of coaxial deep-well casing-shaped underground heat exchanger[D]. Hefei: Anhui Jianzhu University, 2017. (in Chinese with English abstract
    [28]
    季丰旭. 同轴式地下热交换器及其传热模型研究[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2007.

    JI F X. Study on coaxial underground heat exchanger and heat transfer model[D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2007. (in Chinese with English abstract
    [29]
    宁轶. 基于CFD的套管式地埋管的换热影响因素分析[D]. 武汉: 华中科技大学, 2018.

    NING Y. The analysis of influence factors of the coaxial tube borehole heat exchanger baced on CFD[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 2018. (in Chinese with English abstract
    [30]
    关鹏, 段新胜, 焦玉勇, 等. 同轴地埋管换热器岩土热响应试验研究[J]. 太阳能学报, 2022, 43(2): 55-61.

    GUAN P, DUAN X S, JIAO Y Y, et al. Experimental study on geotechnical thermal response test of coaxial borehole heat exchanger[J]. Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2022, 43(2): 55-61. (in Chinese with English abstract
    [31]
    张东海. 分层和渗流条件下竖直地埋管换热器传热特性研究[D]. 江苏徐州: 中国矿业大学, 2020.

    ZHANG D H. Investigation on heat transfer behavior of vertical ground heat exchangers in a layered subsurface in the presence of groundwater advection[D]. Xuzhou Jiangsu: China University of Mining and Technology, 2020. (in Chinese with English abstract
    [32]
    GEHLIN S. Thermal response test: Method development and evaluation[D]. Lulea, Sweden: Lulea University of Technology, 2002.
    [33]
    CAO D F, SHI B, ZHU H H, et al. A field study on the application of distributed temperature sensing technology in thermal response tests for borehole heat exchangers[J]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2019, 78(6): 3901-3915. doi: 10.1007/s10064-018-1407-2
    [34]
    OH K, LEE S, PARK S, et al. Field experiment on heat exchange performance of various coaxial-type ground heat exchangers considering construction conditions[J]. Renewable Energy, 2019, 144: 84-96. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.10.078
    [35]
    LI P, GUAN P, ZHENG J, et al. Field test and numerical simulation on heat transfer performance of coaxial borehole heat exchanger[J]. Energies, 2020, 13(20): 5471. doi: 10.3390/en13205471
    [36]
    LUO Y Q, CHENG N, XU G Z. Analytical modeling and thermal analysis of deep coaxial borehole heat exchanger with stratified-seepage-segmented finite line source method (S3-FLS)[J]. Energy and Buildings, 2022, 257: 111795. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111795
    [37]
    ZHANG L F, HUANG G S, ZHANG Q, et al. An hourly simulation method for the energy performance of an office building served by a ground-coupled heat pump system[J]. Renewable Energy, 2018, 126: 495-508. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.03.082
    [38]
    PU L, QI D, XU L L, et al. Optimization on the performance of ground heat exchangers for GSHP using Kriging model based on MOGA[J]. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2017, 118: 480-489. doi: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.02.114
    [39]
    ZHENG J, LI P, DOU B, et al. Impact research of well layout schemes and fracture parameters on heat production performance of enhanced geothermal system considering water cooling effect[J]. Energy, 2022, 255: 124496. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.124496
    [40]
    ARIAS-PENAS D, CASTRO-GARCÍA M P, REY-RONCO M A, et al. Determining the thermal diffusivity of the ground based on subsoil temperatures: Preliminary results of an experimental geothermal borehole study Q-THERMIE-UNIOVI[J]. Geothermics, 2015, 54: 35-42. doi: 10.1016/j.geothermics.2014.10.006
    [41]
    YOON S, LEE S R, KIM M J, et al. Evaluation of stainless steel pipe performance as a ground heat exchanger in ground-source heat-pump system[J]. Energy, 2016, 113: 328-337. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.07.057
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article Views(36) PDF Downloads(2) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return