Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
ZHU Jiawei,LI Shaohua,LI Jinbu,et al. Generative adversarial network-based sedimentary facies modeling under different conditional simulation strategies[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology,2026,45(3):375-389 doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20250431
Citation: ZHU Jiawei,LI Shaohua,LI Jinbu,et al. Generative adversarial network-based sedimentary facies modeling under different conditional simulation strategies[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology,2026,45(3):375-389 doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20250431

Generative adversarial network-based sedimentary facies modeling under different conditional simulation strategies

doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20250431
More Information
  • Objective 

    Reservoir sedimentary facies modeling is a core link in oil and gas exploration and development, and generative adversarial networks (GANs) have become an important technical means for this research field due to their strong ability to learn complex geological spatial features. However, existing studies on conditional geological modeling using GANs have mainly focused on the development of theoretical methods and the exploration of their preliminary applications, while lacking a systematic and quantitative evaluation of the simulation performance of different conditioning approaches under varying well densities. This deficiency makes it difficult to provide accurate and operable references for the selection of conditioning methods in practical reservoir sedimentary facies modeling.

    Methods 

    To fill this research gap, this study investigated the conditioning methods for GAN-based geological modeling and systematically evaluated the simulation effects of three typical conditioning strategies under different well densities (2%, 4%, 6%, 8% and 10% in this experiment). The three strategies are as follows: ① A conditional loss function method that explicitly incorporates well-point conditioning loss into the training process to optimize the generator of GANs; ② A latent vector search method based on gradient descent, which iteratively optimizes the latent vector to match the well-point constraints; ③ A latent vector search method based on a pre-trained neural network, which builds a mapping network to realize the rapid conversion from conditional data to latent vectors. In the research, well-point matching rate was used as the quantitative index to evaluate the local constraint satisfaction degree, and sandbody connectivity analysis was adopted as the key index to characterize the rationality of the global geological structure. On this basis, a series of comparative experiments were designed to verify the performance of the three methods, and the study further explored the interactive effect between conditional loss weight and well density on the modeling results for the conditional loss function method, which is the most potential one among the three strategies.

    Results 

    Comprehensive experimental results show that the conditional loss function strategy is overall superior to the other two methods in terms of operational convenience and modeling efficiency. More importantly, it can flexibly balance the constraint accuracy and geological pattern diversity by adjusting the weight of conditional loss, making it suitable for the modeling scenarios that need to take both global geological structure and local well-point precision into account. The gradient descent method has obvious advantages in well-point matching rate, especially under low well density conditions, but it has the disadvantages of high computational cost and high sensitivity to the initial value of latent vector. The neural network mapping method features ultra-fast model generation speed, which is suitable for rapid inference and large-scale batch simulation scenarios. In addition, the experiment also found that there is a critical interval of loss weight (from 100 to 1000) for the conditional loss function method, and selecting the weight within this interval can effectively achieve a reasonable balance between constraint accuracy and geological pattern diversity in sedimentary facies modeling.

    Conclusions 

    This study reveals the inherent law of performance variation of different GAN conditioning methods under different well densities, and clarifies the applicable characteristics of each method. The research results provide quantitative references for the selection of conditioning strategies and the setting of key parameters in sedimentary facies modeling under different well densities, and also lay a certain technical foundation for the engineering application of GANs in the field of oil and gas reservoir geological modeling.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    贾爱林, 郭智, 郭建林, 等. 中国储层地质模型30年[J]. 石油学报, 2021, 42(11): 1506-1515.

    JIA A L, GUO Z, GUO J L, et al. Thirty years of reservoir geological modeling in China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2021, 42(11): 1506-1515. (in Chinese with English abstract
    [2]
    李宏达, 吴志春, 柏瑞, 等. 复杂脉状矿体精细化三维建模方法探讨[J]. 地质科技通报, 2025, 44(4): 379-390. doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20240050

    LI H D, WU Z C, BAI R, et al. Discussion on fine 3D modeling method of complex vein-type ore body[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2025, 44(4): 379-390. (in Chinese with English abstract doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20240050
    [3]
    陈麒玉, 荀磊, 崔哲思, 等. 三维地质建模技术的最新进展和发展趋势[J]. 地质科技通报, 2025, 44(3): 373-387. doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20240284

    CHEN Q Y, XUN L, CUI Z S, et al. Recent progress and development trends of three-dimensional geological modeling[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2025, 44(3): 373-387. (in Chinese with English abstract doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20240284
    [4]
    曹砚锋, 李汉兴, 黄辉, 等. 海上油田高效开发钻完井关键技术研究新进展[J]. 中国海上油气, 2022, 34(6): 124-134.

    CAO Y F, LI H X, HUANG H, et al. Research progress on drilling and completion technology for efficient development of offshore oilfields[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2022, 34(6): 124-134. (in Chinese with English abstract
    [5]
    孙福街. 中国海上油田高效开发与提高采收率技术现状及展望[J]. 中国海上油气, 2023, 35(5): 91-99. doi: 10.11935/j.issn.1673-1506.2023.05.009

    SUN F J. Status and prospects of efficient development and EOR technologies in China offshore oilfields[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2023, 35(5): 91-99. (in Chinese with English abstract doi: 10.11935/j.issn.1673-1506.2023.05.009
    [6]
    丁祖鹏, 张雨晴, 王俊杰, 等. 基于自注意力机制生成对抗网络的三维储层建模方法[J]. 地质科技通报, 2025, 44(4): 391-402. doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20250109

    DING Z P, ZHANG Y Q, WANG J J, et al. A self-attention enhanced generative adversarial network approach for three-dimensional reservoir modeling[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2025, 44(4): 391-402. (in Chinese with English abstract doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20250109
    [7]
    宋随宏, 史燕青, 侯加根. 基于生成对抗网络的储层地质建模方法研究进展[J]. 石油科学通报, 2022, 7(1): 34-49.

    SONG S H, SHI Y Q, HOU J G. Review of a generative adversarial networks(GANs)-based geomodelling method[J]. Petroleum Science Bulletin, 2022, 7(1): 34-49. (in Chinese with English abstract
    [8]
    ARJOVSKY M, CHINTALA S, BOTTOU L. Wasserstein generative adversarial networks[C]//Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML). Sydney: PMLR, 2017: 214-223.
    [9]
    ZHONG Z, SUN A Y, JEONG H. Predicting CO2 plume migration in heterogeneous formations using conditional deep convolutional generative adversarial network[J]. Water Resources Research, 2019, 55(7): 5830-5851. doi: 10.1029/2018WR024592
    [10]
    AVALOS S, ORTIZ J M. Geological modeling using a recursive convolutional neural networks approach[OL]. arXiv: 1904.12190 [cs. CV]. 2019 [2026-04-20]. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.1904.12190.
    [11]
    DRAMSCH J S. 70 years of machine learning in geoscience in review[OL]. arXiv:2006.13311 [cs.LG]. 2020 [2026-04-20]. https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.13311.
    [12]
    LALOY E, LINDE N, RUFFINO C, et al. Gradient-based deterministic inversion of geophysical data with generative adversarial networks: Is it feasible?[J]. Computers & Geosciences, 2019, 133: 104333.
    [13]
    SONG S H, ZHANG D X, MUKERJI T, et al. GANSim-surrogate: An integrated framework for stochastic conditional geomodelling[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2023, 620: 129493. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129493
    [14]
    SONG S H, MUKERJI T, HOU J G. Bridging the gap between geophysics and geology with generative adversarial networks[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2022, 60: 5902411. doi: 10.31223/osf.io/ch8xf
    [15]
    MOSSER L, DUBRULE O, BLUNT M J. Stochastic seismic waveform inversion using generative adversarial networks as a geological prior[J]. Mathematical Geosciences, 2020, 52(1): 53-79. doi: 10.1007/s11004-019-09832-6
    [16]
    SONG S H, MUKERJI T, HOU J G, et al. GANSim-3D for conditional geomodeling: Theory and field application[J]. Water Resources Research, 2022, 58(7): e2021WR031865.
    [17]
    GOODFELLOW I, POUGET-ABADIE J, MIRZA M, et al. Generative adversarial networks[J]. Communications of the ACM, 2020, 63(11): 139-144. doi: 10.1145/3422622
    [18]
    李逸达, 朱双, 郑贵洲. 一种基于不规则三角网的精确求交方法及三维地质建模应用[J]. 地质科技通报, 2026, 45(1): 351-359. doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2021.0417

    LI Y D, ZHU S, ZHENG G Z. An exact intersection method for triangulated irregular network and its application to 3D geological modeling[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2026, 45(1): 351-359.(in Chinese with English abstract doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2021.0417
    [19]
    KARRAS T, AILA T, LAINE S, et al. Progressive growing of GANs for improved quality, stability, and variation[OL]. arXiv:1710.10196 [cs.CV]. 2017 [2026-04-20]. https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.10196.
    [20]
    LIU L, MALDONADO-CRUZ E, JO H, et al. Data conditioning for subsurface models with single-image generative adversarial network (SinGAN)[J]. Mathematical Geosciences, 2025, 57(8): 1451-1470. doi: 10.1007/s11004-025-10206-4
    [21]
    DUPONT E, ZHANG T F, TILKE P, et al. Generating realistic geology conditioned on physical measurements with generative adversarial networks[OL]. arXiv:1802.03065 [physics.geo-ph]. 2018 [2026-04-20]. https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.03065.
    [22]
    LALOY E, HÉRAULT R, JACQUES D, et al. Training-image based geostatistical inversion using a spatial generative adversarial neural network[J]. Water Resources Research, 2018, 54(1): 381-406. doi: 10.1002/2017WR022148
    [23]
    ZHANG T F, TILKE P, DUPONT E, et al. Generating geologically realistic 3D reservoir facies models using deep learning of sedimentary architecture with generative adversarial networks[J]. Petroleum Science, 2019, 16(3): 541-549. doi: 10.1007/s12182-019-0328-4
    [24]
    NESVOLD E, MUKERJI T. Simulation of fluvial patterns with GANs trained on a data set of satellite imagery[J]. Water Resources Research, 2021, 57(5): e2019WR025787. doi: 10.1029/2019WR025787
    [25]
    CHAN S, ELSHEIKH A H. Parametric generation of conditional geological realizations using generative neural networks[J]. Computational Geosciences, 2019, 23(5): 925-952. doi: 10.1007/s10596-019-09850-7
    [26]
    SONG S H, MUKERJI T, HOU J G. Geological Facies modeling based on progressive growing of generative adversarial networks (GANs)[J]. Computational Geosciences, 2021, 25(3): 1251-1273. doi: 10.1007/s10596-021-10059-w
    [27]
    刘振峰. 致密砂岩油气藏储层建模技术方案及其应用[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2014, 29(2): 815-823. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0446.2016.10.026

    LIU Z F. Reservoir modeling program for tight oil & gas sands and its applications[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2014, 29(2): 815-823. (in Chinese with English abstract doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0446.2016.10.026
    [28]
    WANG G C, LONG S X, JU Y W, et al. Application of horizontal wells in three-dimensional shale reservoir modeling: A case study of Longmaxi-Wufeng shale in Fuling gas field, Sichuan Basin[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2018, 102(11): 2333-2354. doi: 10.1306/09241919081
    [29]
    WANG L X, YIN Y S, ZHANG C M, et al. A MPS-based novel method of reconstructing 3D reservoir models from 2D images using seismic constraints[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2022, 209: 109974. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109974
    [30]
    CAUMON G, GRAY G, ANTOINE C, et al. Three-dimensional implicit stratigraphic model building from remote sensing data on tetrahedral meshes: Theory and application to a regional model of La Popa Basin, NE Mexico[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2013, 51(3): 1613-1621. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2012.2207727
    [31]
    CAUMON G, COLLON-DROUAILLET P, LE CARLIER DE VESLUD C, et al. Surface-based 3D modeling of geological structures[J]. Mathematical Geosciences, 2009, 41(8): 927-945. doi: 10.1007/s11004-009-9244-2
    [32]
    王清媛. 基于深度学习的沉积微相识别研究[D]. 西安: 西安石油大学, 2021.

    WANG Q Y. Research on sedimentary microfacies recognition based on deep learning[D]. Xi'an: Xi'an Shiyou University, 2021. (in Chinese with English abstract
    [33]
    王海峰, 任梦怡, 李伟, 等. 复合砂体构型约束的井间连通性定量评价[J]. 中国海上油气, 2025, 37(5): 83-93. doi: 10.11935/j.issn.1673-1506.2025.05.008

    WANG H F, REN M Y, LI W, et al. Quantitative evaluation of inter-well connectivity constrained by compound sandbody configuration[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2025, 37(5): 83-93. (in Chinese with English abstract doi: 10.11935/j.issn.1673-1506.2025.05.008
    [34]
    周静萍, 李震, 吴迪, 等. 稀井网条件下基于单砂体构型的井间连通性评价[J]. 重庆科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 27(2): 30-38. doi: 10.19406/j.issn.2097-4531.2025.02.004

    ZHOU J P, LI Z, WU D, et al. Evaluation of interwell connectivity based on sandbody configuration under the thin well pattern conditions[J]. Journal of Chongqing University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2025, 27(2): 30-38. (in Chinese with English abstract doi: 10.19406/j.issn.2097-4531.2025.02.004
    [35]
    卢昌盛. 基于生成对抗网络的储层地质建模[D]. 武汉: 长江大学, 2025.

    LU C S. Reservoir geological modeling based on generative adversarial networks [D]. Wuhan: Yangtze University, 2025. (in Chinese with English abstract
    [36]
    STREBELLE S. Conditional simulation of complex geological structures using multiple-point statistics[J]. Mathematical Geology, 2002, 34(1): 1-21. doi: 10.1023/A:1014009426274
    [37]
    王立鑫, 尹艳树, 冯文杰, 等. 多点地质统计学中训练图像优选方法及其在地质建模中的应用[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2019, 46(4): 703-709. doi: 10.11698/PED.2019.04.08

    WANG L X, YIN Y S, FENG W J, et al. Training image selection methods in multiple-point geostatistics and their application to geological modeling[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2019, 46(4): 703-709. (in Chinese with English abstract doi: 10.11698/PED.2019.04.08
    [38]
    SHI C, WANG Y. Training image selection for development of subsurface geological cross-section by conditional simulations[J]. Engineering Geology, 2021, 295: 106415. doi: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2021.106415
    [39]
    王鸣川, 段太忠. 基于图型矢量距离的多点地质统计相建模算法[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(8): 916-923. doi: 10.7623/syxb201808007

    WANG M C, DUAN T Z. A multiple-point geostatistical facies modeling algorithm based on pattern vector distance[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2018, 39(8): 916-923. (in Chinese with English abstract doi: 10.7623/syxb201808007
    [40]
    喻思羽, 李少华, 段太忠, 等. 基于局部各向异性的非平稳多点地质统计学算法[J]. 物探与化探, 2017, 41(2): 262-269. doi: 10.11720/wtyht.2017.2.11

    YU S Y, LI S H, DUAN T Z, et al. Non-stationary multiple-point geostatistics algorithm base on local anisotropy[J]. Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration, 2017, 41(2): 262-269. (in Chinese with English abstract doi: 10.11720/wtyht.2017.2.11
    [41]
    STREBELLE S, CAVELIUS C. Solving speed and memory issues in multiple-point statistics simulation program SNESIM[J]. Mathematical Geosciences, 2014, 46(2): 171-186. doi: 10.1007/s11004-013-9489-7
    [42]
    ARPAT G B, CAERS J. Conditional simulation with patterns[J]. Mathematical Geology, 2007, 39(2): 177-203. doi: 10.1007/s11004-006-9075-3
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article Views(117) PDF Downloads(18) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return