Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
GUO Yanhui,LUO Yi,LIU Jing,et al. Distribution characteristics and inversion analysis of in-situ stress field at tunnel site of an extra-long and ultra-deep tunnel in Wumeng Mountain area[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology,2026,45(5):1-12 doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20250272
Citation: GUO Yanhui,LUO Yi,LIU Jing,et al. Distribution characteristics and inversion analysis of in-situ stress field at tunnel site of an extra-long and ultra-deep tunnel in Wumeng Mountain area[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology,2026,45(5):1-12 doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20250272

Distribution characteristics and inversion analysis of in-situ stress field at tunnel site of an extra-long and ultra-deep tunnel in Wumeng Mountain area

doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20250272
More Information
  • Corresponding author: E-mail:guoyanhui0818@kust.edu.cn
  • Received Date: 14 Jun 2025
  • Accepted Date: 29 Oct 2025
  • Rev Recd Date: 28 Oct 2025
  • Available Online: 29 Dec 2025
  • Objective 

    In-situ stress is a fundamental geological parameter dominating the design and construction safety of deep mountain tunnels. With the rapid expansion of transportation infrastructure in southwest China, numerous extra-long and deeply buried tunnels inevitably pass through complex tectonic zones with intense horizontal tectonic compression, where severely high in-situ stress easily triggers large deformation of surrounding rock and rockburst hazards. The Qiaojia Tunnel on the Ludian-Qiaojia Expressway, located on the northeastern margin of the Wumeng Mountain tectonic belt, is a separated double-line extra-long tunnel with a maximum burial depth exceeding 1 600 m. Restricted by field construction conditions, only limited borehole measuring points can be arranged for hydraulic fracturing tests, which fail to reflect the overall spatial distribution of the three-dimensional in-situ stress field across the entire tunnel site. To fully characterize the initial in-situ stress distribution and develop a reliable inversion framework applicable to ultra-deep tunnels under strong tectonic extrusion, this paper carries out systematic field measurement and numerical comparative research.

    Methods 

    First, six sets of hydraulic fracturing in-situ stress data ranging in depths from 346-637 m were collected from borehole K67+910 m in the tunnel exit section and were used to analyze the variation patterns of the three principal stresses with burial depth. The finite element software MIDAS GTS NX was utilized to establish a three-dimensional geomechanical model with a plane size of 2 400 m × 2 400 m. Multiple sets of mechanical parameters for dolomite, limestone, and mudstone are assigned to the model according to official geological investigation documents. Four types of boundary schemes, namely displacement constraint boundary, stress loading boundary, hybrid boundary, and the boundary scheme derived from initial strain energy theory, were separately implemented for comparative inversion tests. The strain-energy-based scheme was selected as the optimal boundary condition due to its superior fitting performance with the measured stress data. After applying the optimal boundary condition to the full-domain model, the inversion results at each measuring point were extracted and compared with field test values, with ±20% defined as the allowable relative error threshold for evaluating inversion accuracy.

    Results 

    Field test results demonstrated that the magnitudes of the three principal stresses increased approximately linearly with burial depth. The magnitude sequence of in-situ stress ranked as follows: maximum horizontal principal stress (SH) > vertical overburden stress (Sv) > minimum horizontal principal stress (Sh). The dominant azimuth of the measured SH was NW32°, proving that the regional stress field was dominated by horizontal tectonic stress. The numerical inversion results indicated that the simulated SH azimuth was concentrated between NW30° and NW35°, which achieved high consistency with field measurement. The relative errors at most measuring points were controlled within 15%, and all errors fell within the permissible range. In addition, the simulated growth gradient of principal stress with depth was consistent with field measurements, verifying the stability and reliability of the strain-energy-based inversion method.

    Conclusion 

    This study systematically clarifies the applicable scope and inherent limitations of four commonly used boundary schemes for in-situ stress inversion. Compared with traditional single-boundary inversion methods, the proposed strain-energy-based approach can simultaneously reconstruct both gravity-induced stress and regional tectonic stress fields without obvious distortion of stress contour distribution. The distribution patterns and quantitative stress data obtained in this research can provide solid theoretical support and practical engineering references for the in-situ stress inversion of analogous ultra-deep extra-long tunnels, and can guide the optimization of surrounding rock support parameters and the early warning of high-stress geological disasters such as rockbursts and large deformation caused by extrusion.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    刘泉声, 王栋, 朱元广, 等. 支持向量回归算法在地应力场反演中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(增刊1): 319-328. doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.0860

    LIU Q S, WANG D, ZHU Y G, et al. Application of support vector regression algorithm in inversion of geostress field[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(S1): 319-328. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.0860
    [2]
    姜山, 陈诺, 李健康, 等. 高地应力公路隧道应力场反演及岩爆预测[J]. 公路交通科技, 2025, 42(9): 168-175.

    JIANG S, CHEN N, LI J K, et al. Stress field inversion and rockburst prediction on highway tunnel with high geostress[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2025, 42(9): 168-175. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [3]
    于清浩. 隧道极高地应力反演及大变形预警标准研究[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2025, 42(9): 80-85.

    YU Q H. Research on inversion of extremely in-situ stress and warning standard of large deformation in tunnel[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2025, 42(9): 80-85. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [4]
    赵勐, 钮新强, 颜天佑, 等. 考虑层状构造特征影响的岩体地应力场精细反演分析研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2025, 47(6): 1239-1248.

    ZHAO M, NIU X Q, YAN T Y, et al. Inverse analysis method for in-situ stress field of rock mass considering influences of characteristics of layered structure[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2025, 47(6): 1239-1248. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [5]
    DU J J, QIN X H, ZENG Q L, et al. Estimation of the present-day stress field using in-situ stress measurements in the Alxa area, Inner Mongolia for China's HLW disposal[J]. Engineering Geology, 2017, 220: 76-84.
    [6]
    KUANG Z H, QIU S L, LI S J, et al. A new rock brittleness index based on the characteristics of complete stress-strain behaviors[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2021, 54(3): 1109-1128.
    [7]
    赖锦, 苏洋, 肖承文, 等. 地球物理测井在地质领域应用经典案例解析[J]. 地质科技通报, 2024, 43(5): 279-288.

    LAI J, SU Y, XIAO C W, et al. Analysis of typical applications of geophysical well logs in geological fields[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2024, 43(5): 279-288. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [8]
    ITO T, IGARASHI A, KATO H, et al. Crucial effect of system compliance on the maximum stress estimation in the hydrofracturing method: Theoretical considerations and field-test verification[J]. Earth, Planets and Space, 2006, 58(8): 963-971.
    [9]
    崔松, 王晓南, 丁勇, 等. 基于卸荷应力的思山岭深部采区地应力场反演方法研究[J]. 金属矿山, 2025(7): 25-32.

    CUI S, WANG X N, DING Y, et al. Study on inversion method of in-situ stress field in the deep mining process of Sishanling based on unloading stress[J]. Metal Mine, 2025(7): 25-32. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [10]
    XU X Y, XU W Y, SUN N, et al. Inversion study of in-situ stress in the underground powerhouse area of a large hydropower project in Southwest China[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2025, 58(9): 10755-10776.
    [11]
    谢朝杭, 贾哲强, 罗佳鑫, 等. 高地应力条件下多因素耦合大变形分级评价方法研究: 以王家沟隧道为例[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2025, 47(增刊2): 115-120.

    XIE ZH, JIA Z Q, LUO J X, et al. Evaluation method of multi-factor coupled large deformation grading under high geo-stress conditions: Taking Wangjiagou Tunnel as an example[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2025, 47(S2): 115-120. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [12]
    WANG X L, ZHAO C G, CHENG F Y, et al. Study of in situ stress inversion of deeply incised valleys considering the river evolution process[J]. Scientific Reports, 2025, 15: 17295.
    [13]
    蒋健, 董志宏, 周春华, 等. 新疆某高水头抽蓄电站地应力综合测量及应力场反演分析[J]. 水资源与水工程学报, 2025, 36(2): 144-152.

    JIANG J, DONG Z H, ZHOU C H, et al. Comprehensive measurement of geostress and analysis of initial stress field inversion in a high-head pumped storage power station in Xinjiang[J]. Journal of Water Resources and Water Engineering, 2025, 36(2): 144-152. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [14]
    田勇华, 陈焕杰, 罗滔, 等. 西南某水电站地下厂房围岩稳定仿真分析[J]. 武汉大学学报(工学版), 2024, 57(增刊2): 16-20.

    TIAN Y H, CHEN H J, LUO T, et al. Simulation analysis of surrounding rock stability of underground power station chambers in a certain hydropower station in Southwest China[J]. Engineering Journal of Wuhan University, 2024, 57(S2): 16-20. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [15]
    裴书锋, 臧东升, 孙常新, 等. 复杂地质大型地下洞室群地应力场反演方法与应用[J]. 工程科学与技术, 2024, 56(5): 176-189.

    PEI S F, ZANG D S, SUN C X, et al. Inversion of in-situ stress field of large underground cavern group in complex geology methods and applications[J]. Advanced Engineering Sciences, 2024, 56(5): 176-189. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [16]
    韩晓玉, 郑炜烽, 董志宏, 等. 高水头抽水蓄能电站地应力综合测试及抗劈裂分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2167-2174.

    HAN X Y, ZHENG W F, DONG Z H, et al. Comprehensive testing and analysis of crack resistance in high-head pumped storage power stations[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(7): 2167-2174. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [17]
    TANG Z, WU Z W, JIA D W, et al. The distribution law of ground stress field in Yingcheng coal mine based on rhino surface modeling[J]. Processes, 2024, 12(4): 668.
    [18]
    高桂云, 王成虎, 刘冀昆, 等. 倾斜钻孔三维地应力张量反演方法及其应用研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2024, 43(增刊2): 3700-3709.

    GAO G Y, WANG C H, LIU J K, et al. Three-dimensional in-situ stress tensor inversion method for inclined drilling and its application research[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2024, 43(S2): 3700-3709. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [19]
    LIANG J, ZHU Q J, SUI L K, et al. Research on elaborate construction of complex 3D geological model and in-situ stress inversion[J]. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2024, 42(2): 1373-1388.
    [20]
    张社荣, 胡安奎, 王超, 等. 基于SLR-ANN的地应力场三维智能反演方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2017, 38(9): 2737-2745.

    ZHANG S R, HU A K, WANG C, et al. Three-dimensional intelligent inversion method for in-situ stress field based on SLR-ANN algorithm[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2017, 38(9): 2737-2745. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [21]
    周围维, 冯永存, 李晓蓉, 等. 量子群优化算法在断层滑动擦痕反演地应力中的应用研究[J]. 地质力学学报, 2025, 31(6): 1238-1254.

    ZHOU W W, FENG Y C, LI X R, et al. Research on the application of the quantum-behaved particle swarm optimization algorithm in the inverse estimation of in-situ stress based on fault-slip fractures[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 2025, 31(6): 1238-1254. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [22]
    曹子阳, 王建, 袁智焕, 等. 地应力反演修正的Stacking集成模型与工程应用[J]. 水力发电学报, 2025, 44(11): 115-126.

    CAO Z Y, WANG J, YUAN Z H, et al. Stacking ensemble model for in-situ stress inversion correction and its engineering application[J]. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 2025, 44(11): 115-126. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [23]
    周正, 杨旺, 侯东波, 等. 基于机器学习的深埋长隧道沿线地应力场反演方法[J]. 安全与环境工程, 2025, 32(5): 56-65.

    ZHOU Z, YANG W, HOU D B, et al. Inversion method of stress field along deep buried long tunnel based on machine learning[J]. Safety and Environmental Engineering, 2025, 32(5): 56-65. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [24]
    李建新, 张继勋, 马佳, 等. 基于LASSO-OLS方法的初始地应力场反演优化[J]. 隧道建设(中英文), 2025, 45(9): 1698-1710.

    LI J X, ZHANG J X, MA J, et al. Optimizing initial geostress field inversion using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator-ordinary least squares method[J]. Tunnel Construction, 2025, 45(9): 1698-1710. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [25]
    王金安, 李飞. 复杂地应力场反演优化算法及研究新进展[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2015, 44(2): 189-205.

    WANG J A, LI F. Review of inverse optimal algorithm of in-situ stress filed and new achievement[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2015, 44(2): 189-205. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [26]
    蒙伟, 何川, 陈子全, 等. 岭回归在岩体初始地应力场反演中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(4): 1156-1169.

    MENG W, HE C, CHEN Z Q, et al. Application of ridge regression in the inversion analysis of the initial geo-stress field of rock masses[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(4): 1156-1169. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [27]
    REN Y Q, TANG B L, CHEN X M, et al. Inversion analysis of the three-dimensional geostress field in a tunnel[J]. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2021, 643(1): 012047.
    [28]
    索朗, 徐正宣, 冯涛, 等. 鲜水河构造带某隧道地应力反演与分析[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2022, 57(2): 331-338.

    SUO L, XU Z X, FENG T, et al. Inversion and analysis of ground stress in a tunnel in Xianshuihe tectonic belt[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2022, 57(2): 331-338. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [29]
    周佐健, 陈焕杰, 罗滔, 等. 地下厂房初始地应力简易FLAC3D反演方法[J]. 武汉大学学报(工学版), 2024, 57(增刊2): 11-15.

    ZHOU Z J, CHEN H J, LUO T, et al. Simple FLAC3D inversion method for initial geostress of underground powerhouse[J]. Engineering Journal of Wuhan University, 2024, 57(S2): 11-15. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [30]
    LIU X G, HUANG C C, ZHU W C, et al. In situ stress inversion using nonlinear stress boundaries achieved by the bubbling method[J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2025, 17(3): 1510-1527.
    [31]
    何军杰, 胡松, 郭永刚, 等. 基于多元线性回归原理的高海拔深埋隧道地应力反演分析[J]. 防灾减灾工程学报, 2024, 44(1): 120-127.

    HE J J, HU S, GUO Y G, et al. Inversion analysis of ground stress in high-altitude deep-buried tunnels based on multiple linear regression principle[J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering, 2024, 44(1): 120-127. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [32]
    周家兴. 基于深度学习的深部复杂地应力场反演算法研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2024, 43(4): 1040.

    ZHOU J X. Research on inversion algorithm of deep complex in-situ stress field based on depth learning[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2024, 43(4): 1040. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [33]
    张晨, 沈波, 刘桂卫. 浩吉铁路某长深隧道地应力三维反演技术研究[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2022, 39(8): 30-34.

    ZHANG C, SHEN B, LIU G W. Study on three-dimensional inversion technology of ground stress in a long deep tunnel of Haoji Railway[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2022, 39(8): 30-34. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [34]
    骆俊晖, 米德才, 叶琼瑶, 等. 基于Midas模型下考虑构造应力场深埋隧道围岩稳定性研究[J]. 灾害学, 2018, 33(增刊1): 81-86.

    LUO J H, MI D C, YE Q Y, et al. Study on the stability of surrounding rock of deep buried tunnel considering tectonic stress field based on Midas model[J]. Journal of Catastrophology, 2018, 33(S1): 81-86. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [35]
    柳禄湧, 李凯舟, 王能伟, 等. 山东招远水旺庄金矿深部地应力特征及其岩爆倾向性分析[J]. 地质力学学报, 2023, 29(3): 417-429.

    LIU L Y, LI K Z, WANG N W, et al. In-situ stress characteristics and rockburst tendency of surrounding rocks in the Shuiwangzhuang gold deposit, Zhaoyuan, Shandong Province[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 2023, 29(3): 417-429. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [36]
    张斌, 孙尧, 马秀敏, 等. 东构造结墨脱关键区域地应力场特征及其构造稳定性分析[J]. 地质力学学报, 2023, 29(3): 388-401.

    ZHANG B, SUN Y, MA X M, et al. In-situ stress field characteristics and tectonic stability analysis of the key area of Jiemotuo in the eastern structure[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 2023, 29(3): 388-401. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [37]
    王世业. 基于初始应力场反演的高地应力层状隧道围岩稳定性评价及变形处理措施研究[D]. 西安: 长安大学, 2021.

    WANG S Y. Study on stability evaluation and deformation treatment measures of surrounding rock of layered tunnel with high ground stress based on inversion of initial stress field[D]. Xi'an: Changan University, 2021. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [38]
    朱明德, 王照亚, 张月征, 等. 基于水压致裂法的三山岛深竖井工程区地应力测量与反演分析[J]. 地质力学学报, 2023, 29(3): 430-441.

    ZHU M D, WANG Z Y, ZHANG Y Z, et al. In-situ stress measurement and inversion analysis of Sanshandao deep shaft engineering area based on hydraulic fracturing method[J]. Journal of Geomechanics, 2023, 29(3): 430-441. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [39]
    云南省交通规划设计研究院有限公司. 鲁甸至巧家高速公路两阶段施工图设计工程地质勘察报告[R]. 昆明: 云南省交通规划设计研究院有限公司, 2022.

    Yunnan Provincial Transportation Planning and Design Institute Co. , Ltd. Engineering geological investigation report on two-stage construction drawing design of Ludian-Qiaojia Expressway[R]. Kunming: Yunnan Provincial Transportation Planning and Design Institute Co. , Ltd. , 2022. (in Chinese)
    [40]
    林子晗, 夏元, 张航川, 等. 幕阜山岩体北缘鄂南地区构造特征与构造控矿作用[J]. 地质科技通报, 2025, 44(2): 257-269.

    LIN Z H, XIA Y, ZHANG H C, et al. Structural characteristics and tectonic controls on mineralization in the northern margin of the Mufushan pluton, southern Hubei region[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2025, 44(2): 257-269. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [41]
    郭延辉, 侯克鹏. 基于FLAC3D的岩体初始高水平构造应力场反演方法[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2020, 20(21): 8523-8529.

    GUO Y H, HOU K P. Inversion method of initial high level tectonic stress field of rock mass based on FLAC3D[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2020, 20(21): 8523-8529. (in Chinese with English abstract)
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article Views(162) PDF Downloads(18) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return