CSCD来源期刊

北大中文核心期刊

中国科技核心期刊

地学领域高质量科技期刊分级T2区（2023）

世界期刊影响力指数报告Q1区（2023）

Volume 40 Issue 2
Mar.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
Article Navigation >  Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology  > 2021  >  40(2): 1-12
Wei Junhao, Li Peng, Li Yibang, Chen Dingjie, Wang Haifeng, Zhong Yongsheng, Feng Zhixing. Material field structure of ore-forming elements and deep prospecting potential of Xitieshan lead-zinc deposit, Qinghai Province[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2021, 40(2): 1-12. doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2021.0203
Citation: Wei Junhao, Li Peng, Li Yibang, Chen Dingjie, Wang Haifeng, Zhong Yongsheng, Feng Zhixing. Material field structure of ore-forming elements and deep prospecting potential of Xitieshan lead-zinc deposit, Qinghai Province[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2021, 40(2): 1-12. doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2021.0203
shu

Material field structure of ore-forming elements and deep prospecting potential of Xitieshan lead-zinc deposit, Qinghai Province

doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2021.0203
  • Received Date: 12 May 2020
    Abstract
  • The Xitieshan lead-zinc deposit in Qaidam, Qinghai Province, is a large-scale SEDEX deposit in China. The host rocks are mainly marble and schist, the marble-style ore-bodies mainly exist in the shallow part and the schist-style ore-bodies mainly exist in the deep part. This paper systematically describes the spatial symbiosis relationship between lead-zinc ore-body and pyrite in different ore types and the three-dimensional spatial change rule of ore-body spatial shape. The material field structure and change trend of Pb, Zn, Ag, Au and other ore-forming elements in the mining area are systematically analyzed by the local singularity analysis method and correlation analysis method. Both analysis methods show different structural characteristics of the material field of elements, that is, Pb, Zn and Au are still obviously enriched to the depth along the side direction of the ore-body as a whole, and are not affected by marble. In the schist, the concentration of elements is still very strong, and Ag is obviously discontinuous in the mineralization space from the shallow to the deep. The element zoning in the horizontal direction of Xitieshan lead-zinc mine is Mn-Fe-S-Ag-Pb-Zn-S-Au from the far (hydrothermal center) to the near, and Mn-S-Ag-Pb-Zn-S-Au from the top to the bottom in the vertical direction. At the same time, we systematically study the change rule of element enrichment structure in the ore forming field, analyze and discuss the prospecting potential in the deep part of Xitieshan.

     

    • FullText(HTML)
  • loading
    • References(28)
  • [1]
    邬介人, 任秉琛, 张莓, 等. 青海锡铁山块状硫化物矿床的类型及地质特征[J]. 中国地质科学院西安地质矿产研究所所刊, 1987(20): 1-88. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XBFK198706000.htm
    [2]
    李峰, 吴志亮, 李保珠, 等. 柴达木盆地北缘滩间山群新厘定[J]. 西北地质, 2006, 39(3): 83-90. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6248.2006.03.012
    [3]
    李峰, 邓吉牛, 坚润堂, 等. 青海锡铁山铅锌矿床地质找矿新进展[J]. 矿物学报, 2007, 7(增刊1): 436-438.
    [4]
    邓吉牛. 青海锡铁山矿区褶皱构造及其找矿预测[J]. 有色金属矿产与勘查, 1999, 18(5): 283-288. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSJS199905004.htm
    [5]
    张德全, 王富春, 李大新, 等. 柴北缘地区的两类块状硫化物矿床: Ⅰ. 锡铁山式SEDEX型铅锌矿床[J]. 矿床地质, 2005, 24(5): 471- 480. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-7106.2005.05.001
    [6]
    张德全, 党兴彦, 李大新, 等. 柴北缘地区的两类块状硫化物矿床: Ⅱ. 青龙滩式VHMS型Cu-S矿床[J]. 矿床地质, 2005, 24(6): 575-583. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-7106.2005.06.001
    [7]
    祝新友, 邓吉牛, 王京彬, 等. 锡铁山铅锌矿床网脉状蚀变管道相的识别与研究[J]. 地球化学, 2007, 36(1): 37-48. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0379-1726.2007.01.004
    [8]
    邓达文, 孔华, 奚小双. 青海锡铁山热水沉积型铅锌矿床的地球化学特征[J]. 矿物岩石地球化学通报, 2003, 22(4): 310-313. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-2802.2003.04.005
    [9]
    李义邦, 李厚友, 钟正春. 锡铁山铅锌矿深边部找矿成就及未来5—10年找矿规划[C]//汪海涛. 戈壁明珠: 锡铁山铅锌矿成矿与找矿前景. 北京: 冶金工业出版社, 2011: 5-31.
    [10]
    孙景. 青海锡铁山铅锌矿矿床成因与成矿预测[D]. 长春: 吉林大学, 2018.
    [11]
    钟永生, 孙华山, 葛风健, 等. 青海锡铁山铅锌矿床喷流管道相识别、控矿作用及其矿床成因和找矿勘查意义[J]. 地质科技情报, 2018, 37(5): 154-161. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201805022.htm
    [12]
    Zhang C, Bader T, Zhang L, et al. The multi-stage tectonic evolution of the Xitieshan terrane, North Qaidam orogen, western China: From Grenville-age orogeny to Early-Paleozoic ultrahigh-pressure metamorphism[J]. Gondwana Research, 2017, 41: 290-300. doi: 10.1016/j.gr.2015.04.011
    [13]
    杨经绥. 许志琴. 宋述光. 等. 青海都兰榴辉岩的发现及对中国中央造山带内高压—超高压变质带研究的意义[J]. 地质学报, 2000, 74(2): 156-168. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZXE200002006.htm
    [14]
    陈丹玲, 孙勇, 刘良, 等. 柴北缘鱼卡河榴辉岩的变质演化—石榴石成分环带及矿物反应结构的证据[J]. 岩石学报, 2005, 21(4): 1039-1048. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSXB200504001.htm
    [15]
    赵志新. 柴北缘锡铁山地区古生代构造岩浆演化与铅锌成矿控制[D]. 武汉: 中国地质大学, 2018.
    [16]
    李鹏, 李义邦, 王海丰, 等. 柴北缘锡铁山铅锌矿床构造变形特征及其地质意义[J]. 地质科技情报, 2019, 38(4): 108-123. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6248.2019.04.008
    [17]
    Song S G, Niu Y L, Su L, et al. Continental orogenesis from ocean subduction, continent collision/subduction, to orogen collapse, and orogen recycling: The example of the North Qaidam UHPM belt, NW China[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 2014, 129: 59-84. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2013.11.010
    [18]
    张建新, 杨经绥, 许志琴, 等. 柴北缘榴辉岩的峰期和退变质年龄: 来自U-Pb及Ar-Ar同位素测定的证据[J]. 地球化学, 2000, 29(3): 217-222. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0379-1726.2000.03.002
    [19]
    祝新友, 邓吉牛, 王京彬, 等. 锡铁山矿床两类喷流沉积成因的铅锌矿体研究[J]. 矿床地质, 2006, 25(3): 252-262. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-7106.2006.03.004
    [20]
    胡荣国, 邱华宁, Jan R WIJBRANS, 等. 柴北缘锡铁山花岗质片麻岩深熔作用年代和冷却历史: 来自浅色体40Ar/39Ar年代学证据[J]. 大地构造与成矿学, 2016, 40(1): 125-135. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DGYK201601011.htm
    [21]
    Cheng Q M, Agterberg F P, Ballatyne S B. The separation of geochemical anomalied from background by fractal methods[J]. J. Geochemical Exploration, 1994, 51: 109-130. doi: 10.1016/0375-6742(94)90013-2
    [22]
    成秋明. 成矿过程奇异性与成矿预测定量化的新理论与新方法[J]. 地学前缘, 2007, 14(5): 42-53. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1005-2321.2007.05.005
    [23]
    Zuo R G, Wang J, Chen G, et al. Identification of weak anomalies: A multi-fractal perspective[J]. J. Geochemical Exploration, 2015, 148: 12-24. doi: 10.1016/j.gexplo.2014.05.005
    [24]
    施海鹏, 魏俊浩, 赵少卿, 等. 宁夏贺兰山北段1∶5万化探数据的含量-面积分形异常特征及找矿预测[J]. 地质科技情报, 2015, 34(3): 71-79, 95. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201503009.htm
    [25]
    Agterberg F P. Multifractals and geostatistics[J]. J. Geochemical Exploration, 2012, 122: 113-123. doi: 10.1016/j.gexplo.2012.04.001
    [26]
    翟玉林, 魏俊浩, 李艳军, 等. SEDEX型矿床研究现状及进展[J]. 物探与化探, 2017, 41(3): 392-401. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WTYH201703002.htm
    [27]
    王振东, 罗先熔. 浅析锡铁山铅锌矿成矿规律及找矿方向[J]. 南方国土资源, 2012(1): 43-46. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-321X.2012.01.013
    [28]
    魏俊浩. 初论成矿场与矿产勘查意义[J]. 地质科技通报, 2020, 39(1): 114-129. http://dzkjqb.cug.edu.cn/CN/abstract/abstract9932.shtml
    • Relative Articles
    • Supplements(0)
    • Cited By
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索
    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML

    Article Metrics

    Article Views(893) PDF Downloads(1102) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    Copyright © 2010Editorial Department of Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology    

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.    

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return