Citation: | Zhang Bingbing, Liu Jie, Akangjiang Tohuti, Wang Bin, Ai Yuhao. Experimental study on the dynamic response of aeolian sand subgrade reinforced by geocells at different depths[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2022, 41(6): 308-315. doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2021.0097 |
The treatment of aeolian sand subgrade has always been a difficult problem for desert highway construction.The geocell reinforcement method can provide a new path for desert highway construction. Combining the S21 line (Urumqi-Altay) desert highway subgrade field test, it is of great value and significance to study the dynamic response characteristics of different subgrade depths for the study of aeolian sand performance of geocelling reinforcement.The results show that ① The test speed has a great influence on the time-history curve fluctuation of dynamic stress, dynamic acceleration and dynamic velocity at different depths of the subgrade, and the peak values of dynamic velocity, dynamic acceleration and dynamic stress increase obviously with increasing speed. ②With the increase in the road base depth, the amplitudes of the dynamic velocity, dynamic acceleration and dynamic stress show a trend of gradual attenuation, among which the attenuation amplitude is the largest in the geocell-reinforced aeolian sand layer. ③ Along the horizontal direction of the cross section of the subgrade, the amplitude of the dynamic velocity, the amplitude of the dynamic acceleration and the amplitude of the dynamic stress attenuate exponentially. When the horizontal distance from the vibration source is 5 m, the amplitude attenuates to approximately 10%. This horizontal range can be used as a reference value for engineering design.
[1] |
杨果林, 王亮亮, 房以河, 等. 云桂高速铁路不同防水层基床动力特性现场试验[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2014, 33(8): 1672-1678. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX201408020.htm
Yang G L, Wang L L, Fang Y H, et al. Field test on dynamic characteristics of different waterproof layer foundation beds in Yunnan-Guangxi High-Speed Railway[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2014, 33(8): 1672-1678 (in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX201408020.htm
|
[2] |
楚纯洁, 赵景波, 吴楠楠, 等. 毛乌素沙地晚第四纪地层特征与沙漠化研究综述[J]. 地质科技情报, 2017, 36(5): 14-21. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201705003.htm
Chu C C, Zhao J B, Wu N N, et al. Review of Late Quaternary strate characteristics and desertification on Mu us Dune Field in North China[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2017, 36(5): 14-21 (in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201705003.htm
|
[3] |
Saride S, Rayabharapu V K, Vedpathak S. Evaluation of rutting behaviour of geocell reinforced sand subgrades under repeated loading[J]. Indian Geotechnical Journal, 2015, 45(4): 378-388. doi: 10.1007/s40098-014-0120-8
|
[4] |
邓鹏, 郭林, 蔡袁强, 等. 考虑填料-土工格室相互作用的加筋路堤力学响应研究[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2015, 34(3): 621-630. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX201503022.htm
Deng P, Guo L, Cai Y Q, et al. Study on the mechanical response of reinforced embankment considering the interaction between filler and geocell[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2015, 34(3): 621-630 (in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YSLX201503022.htm
|
[5] |
李丽华, 文贝, 胡智, 等. 建筑垃圾填料与土工合成材料加筋剪切性能研究[J]. 武汉大学学报: 工学版, 2019, 52(4): 311-316. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WSDD201904005.htm
Li L H, Wen B, Hu Z, et al. Study on reinforcement shear behavior of construction waste filler and geosynthetics[J]. Journal of Wuhan University: Engineering Science, 2019, 52(4): 311-316 (in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WSDD201904005.htm
|
[6] |
Biswas A, Murali Krishna A, Dash S K. Influence of subgrade strength on the performance of geocell-reinforced foundation systems[J]. Geosynthetics International, 2013, 20(6): 376-388. doi: 10.1680/gein.13.00025
|
[7] |
周亚梅, 张孟喜, 吴越. 单个土工格室加筋效果的影响因素分析[J]. 上海交通大学学报, 2015, 49(7): 983-987, 992. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHJT201507012.htm
Zhou Y M, Zhang M X, Wu Y. Factores influencing the behavior of single geocell-reinforced sand[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2015, 49(7): 983-987, 992 (in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHJT201507012.htm
|
[8] |
卢硕. 土工格室加固路基机理及应用研究[D]. 武汉: 武汉科技大学, 2020.
Lu S. Study on the mechanism and application of geocellet for roadbed reinforcement[D]. Wuhan: Wuhan University of Science and Technology, 2020 (in Chinese with English abstract).
|
[9] |
韩晓, 张孟喜, 李嘉洋, 等. 高强土工格室加筋砂土地基模型试验研究[J]. 长江科学院院报, 2014, 31(3): 27-33. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5485.2014.03.004
Han X, Zhang M X, Li J Y, et al. Model test of sand foundation reinforced by geocell with high strength[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2014, 31(3): 27-33 (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5485.2014.03.004
|
[10] |
汤连生, 廖化荣, 刘增贤, 等. 路基土动荷载下力学行为研究进展[J]. 地质科技情报, 2006, 25(2): 103-112. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7849.2006.02.019
Tang L S, Liao H R, Liu Z X, et al. Research progress of mechanical behavior of subgrade soil under dynamic load[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2006, 25(2): 103-112 (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7849.2006.02.019
|
[11] |
Hegde A, Sitharam T G. Behaviour of geocell reinforced soft clay bed subjected to incremental cyclic loading[J]. Geomechanics & Engineering, 2016, 10(4): 405-422.
|
[12] |
Latha G M, Manju G S. Seismic response of geocell retaining walls through shaking table tests[J]. International Journal of Geosynthetics and Ground Engineering, 2016, 2(1): 1-15.
|
[13] |
孙州, 张孟喜, 姜圣卫. 条形荷载下土工格室加筋砂土路堤模型试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2015, 37(增刊2): 170-175. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC2015S2034.htm
Sun Z, Zhang M X, Jiang S W. Model test of geo-cell reinforced sand embankment under strip loading[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2015, 37(S2): 170-175 (in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YTGC2015S2034.htm
|
[14] |
金家庆, 徐超, 梁程, 等. 土工格室加筋垫层路堤破坏模式和稳定性评价[J]. 水文地质工程地质, 2019, 46(1): 86-94. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SWDG201901012.htm
Jin J Q, Xu C, Liang C, et al. Failure mode and stability evaluation of geocell reinforced cushioned embankment[J]. Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology, 2019, 46(1): 86-94 (in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SWDG201901012.htm
|
[15] |
张健, 刘俊. 填石路堤强夯加固施工参数及路基动应力响应规律研究[J]. 铁道科学与工程学报, 2020, 17(1): 95-101. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CSTD202001012.htm
Zhang J, Liu J. Study on construction parameters of rock filled embankment reinforced by dynamic compaction and dynamic stress response law of subgrade[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2020, 17(1): 95-101 (in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CSTD202001012.htm
|
[16] |
邱长林, 张庆建. 路基地震峰值加速度响应特性振动台试验研究[J]. 地震工程学报, 2014, 36(4): 778-783. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZBDZ201404003.htm
Qiu C L, Zhang Q J. Shaking table test on response characteristics of seismic peak acceleration of subgrade[J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2014, 36(4): 778-783 (in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZBDZ201404003.htm
|
[17] |
姜领发, 熊署丹, 陈善雄, 等. 列车荷载作用下高铁路基速度传递规律模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2015, 36(增刊1): 265-269.
Jiang L F, Xiong S D, Chen S X, et al. Model experimental study on speed transfer law of high-speed railway under train loading[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2015, 36(S1): 265-269 (in Chinese with English abstract).
|