留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

相场法高压电脉冲压裂岩体裂缝扩展规律

饶平平,  李超,  王俊瑶,  金潇,  崔纪飞

饶平平,李超,王俊瑶,等. 相场法高压电脉冲压裂岩体裂缝扩展规律[J]. 地质科技通报,2026,45(5):1-14 doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20250295
引用本文: 饶平平,李超,王俊瑶,等. 相场法高压电脉冲压裂岩体裂缝扩展规律[J]. 地质科技通报,2026,45(5):1-14 doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20250295
RAO Pingping,LI Chao,WANG Junyao,et al. Fracture propagation patterns of rock mass induced by high-voltage electrical pulse based on phase-field method[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology,2026,45(5):1-14 doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20250295
Citation: RAO Pingping,LI Chao,WANG Junyao,et al. Fracture propagation patterns of rock mass induced by high-voltage electrical pulse based on phase-field method[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology,2026,45(5):1-14 doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20250295

相场法高压电脉冲压裂岩体裂缝扩展规律

doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20250295
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目(42077435;42377171)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    饶平平:E-mail:raopingping@usst.edu.cn

    通讯作者:

    E-mail:233432021@st.usst.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: P634;TU452

Fracture propagation patterns of rock mass induced by high-voltage electrical pulse based on phase-field method

More Information
  • 摘要:

    揭示高压电脉冲载荷作用下岩体裂缝萌生与扩展内在机制,厘清冲击波驱动下岩体损伤与裂缝演化时序关系,明确放电回路关键参数对破岩效果的影响规律,为高压电脉冲破岩设备参数优化提供理论支撑。基于断裂力学与损伤力学理论,融合 RLC 放电电路与 Weizel-Rompe 等离子体电弧阻抗模型,建立考虑拉伸−压缩应变分解的相场断裂耦合数值模型,开展高压电脉冲破岩数值仿真;采用相场变量实现裂缝增长长度与岩体损伤面积的定量统计,分析冲击波、放电电压、电容、电感及等离子体通道长度对岩体破裂行为的影响。岩体损伤演化与冲击波强度及其上升速率密切相关,损伤不等同于裂缝扩展,损伤萌生先于宏观裂缝起裂,是裂缝形成的前置过程;冲击波强度越高、上升速率越快,裂缝扩展速率越快,岩体损伤程度加剧、损伤范围扩大;破岩效果随放电电压、储能电容增大而提升,随等离子体通道长度增大而减弱;回路电感小幅变化对破岩效果影响有限,但电感显著增大会抑制瞬时能量释放,削弱岩体破碎效果;电脉冲作用点位移波形与冲击波压力波形形态相近,受岩体材料变形及内部能量耗散效应影响,位移响应相对冲击波压力存在明显滞后效应。所建立的耦合模型可实现高压电脉冲下岩体裂缝与损伤的定量表征,研究结果可为电脉冲破岩设备的工程参数选型与调试提供理论参考。

     

  • 图 1  高压电脉冲等效放电电路

    L为回路电感,用来储存磁能,其电流不能突变,表现为感性阻抗;C为放电电容,用来储存电能,其电压U不能突变,表现为容性阻抗;Rz为放电装置的电阻;Rch为电弧通道的电阻;S为开关;下同

    Figure 1.  Equivalent discharge circuit of high-voltage electrical pulse

    图 2  高压电脉冲放电过程步骤

    $ {U}_{0} $为$ t=0 $时放电电压;i'为回路电流;P为冲击波压力;下同

    Figure 2.  Steps of high-voltage electrical pulse discharge process

    图 3  计算模型示意图

    Ω为岩体计算域;$ {\sigma }_{x} $为 $ x $方向初始地应力;$ {\sigma }_{y} $为 $ y $方向初始地应力;$ \mathit{\Gamma } $为预制裂缝(裂缝集合);$ r $为钻孔半径(通道半径);$ {l}_{0} $为相场长度尺度参数;下同

    Figure 3.  Schematic diagram of calculation model

    图 4  RLC 电路电流−电压时程曲线

    Figure 4.  Current-voltage time-history curves of RLC circuit

    图 5  冲击波压力时程曲线

    Figure 5.  Time-history curve of shock wave pressure

    图 6  相场模型数值迭代计算步骤

    ${\boldsymbol{u}}_{i}^{j=0} $,${\boldsymbol{H}}_{i}^{j=0} $,$\phi_{i}^{j=0} $分别为第i个计算步、第0次迭代时的位移场、历史场、相场的初始值;${\boldsymbol{u}}_i^j $,${\boldsymbol{H}}_{i}^{j} $,$\phi_i^j $分别为第i个计算步、第j次迭代时的位移场、历史场、相场;${\boldsymbol{u}}_{i}^{j+1} $,${\boldsymbol{H}}_{i}^{j+1} $,$\phi_{i}^{j+1} $分别为第i个计算步、第j+1次迭代更新后的位移场、历史场、相场。N-R为Newton-Raphson

    Figure 6.  Numerical iterative calculation steps of phase-field model

    图 7  本模型与文献[39]结果对比

    Figure 7.  Comparison between this model and results from reference [39]

    图 8  高压电脉冲作用下岩体裂缝扩展演化规律

    云图颜色仅表征裂缝、损伤场及位移场的空间分布形态,不可作为定量数值读取依据,图12同此说明

    Figure 8.  Propagation and evolution patterns of rock fractures under high-voltage electrical pulse

    图 9  0~600 μs 岩体裂缝扩展、损伤面积与冲击波压力演化曲线

    Figure 9.  Evolution curves of rock mass fracture propagation, damage area, and shock wave pressure during 0–600 μs

    图 10  高压电脉冲作用下不同时刻岩体位移场云图

    Figure 10.  Contour maps of rock mass displacement field at different moments under high-voltage electric pulse

    图 11  电脉冲作用点位移与冲击波压力时程曲线

    Figure 11.  Time-history curves of displacement at electrical pulse application point and shock wave pressure

    图 12  不同放电电压U0下冲击波压力时程(a)及初始裂缝扩展至模型边界时岩体位移云图(b~d)

    Figure 12.  Time-history curves of shock wave pressure (a) and displacement contours of rock mass as the initial crack extends to the model boundary (b-d) under different discharge voltages U0

    图 13  不同放电电压U0下初始裂缝增长长度与岩石损伤面积

    Figure 13.  Initial fracture growth length and rock damage area under different discharge voltages U0

    图 14  不同电容C下冲击波压力时程(a)与峰值时刻t=300 μs时岩体破裂统计结果(b)

    Figure 14.  Time-history curves of shock wave pressure (a) and statistical results of rock mass fracture at peak time t=300 μs (b) under different capacitances C

    图 15  不同回路电感L下冲击波压力时程(a)与峰值时刻t=300 μs时岩体破裂统计结果(b)

    Figure 15.  Time-history curves of shock wave pressure (a) and statistical results of rock mass fracture at peak time t=300 μs (b) under different inductances L

    图 16  不同等离子体通道长度lch下冲击波压力时程(a)与峰值时刻t=300 μs时岩体破裂统计结果(b)

    Figure 16.  Time-history curves of shock wave pressure (a) and statistical results of rock mass fracture at peak time t=300 μs (b) under different plasma channel lengths lch

    表  1  数值模型参数

    Table  1.   Numerical model parameters

    类别 参数 数值
    岩体 孔隙率 0.1
    泊松比 0.3
    弹性模量/GPa 11.1
    密度/(kg·m−3) 1515
    临界能量释放率/(N·m−1) 40
    基质渗透率/m2 1×10−18
    裂隙渗透率/m2 1×10−14
    电路 电容/μF 5
    电感/μH 5
    放电装置电阻/Ω 1
    火花常数/(V·s1/2·m−1) 611
    等离子通道 等离子通道长度/mm 60
    比热比 1.1
    体积常数/GPa 8.5
    材料系数 4
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 彭建宇, 王浩南, 吴硕, 等. 红砂岩受高压电脉冲击穿作用下的破裂行为试验研究[J]. 金属矿山, 2022(11): 71-76. doi: 10.19614/j.cnki.jsks.202211009

    PENG J Y, WANG H N, WU S, et al. Experimental study on fracture behavior of red sandstone subjected to breakdown effect of high voltage electric pulse[J]. Metal Mine, 2022(11): 71-76. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.19614/j.cnki.jsks.202211009
    [2] 左蔚然, 贺泽铭, 印万忠, 等. 多宝山铜矿石高压电脉冲破碎预处理试验研究[J]. 金属矿山, 2019(8): 71-77. doi: 10.19614/j.cnki.jsks.201908013

    ZUO W R, HE Z M, YIN W Z, et al. Experiment study on high voltage pulse pretreatment of Duobaoshan copper ore[J]. Metal Mine, 2019(8): 71-77. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.19614/j.cnki.jsks.201908013
    [3] WANG S, GUO Y C, CHENG G, et al. Performance study of hybrid magnetic coupler based on magneto thermal coupled analysis[J]. Energies, 2017, 10(8): 1148. doi: 10.3390/en10081148
    [4] 魏迎春, 王亚东, 张劲, 等. 煤层气水平井钻井工程因素对煤粉产出影响的数值模拟: 以柳林区块为例[J]. 矿业科学学报, 2022, 7(6): 670-679. doi: 10.19606/j.cnki.jmst.2022.06.004

    WEI Y C, WANG Y D, ZHANG J, et al. Numerical simulation on the effect of drilling engineering factors on coal fines output in coalbed methane horizontal wells: A case study of Liulin block[J]. Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 2022, 7(6): 670-679. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.19606/j.cnki.jmst.2022.06.004
    [5] 刘淑琴, 畅志兵, 刘金昌. 深部煤炭原位气化开采关键技术及发展前景[J]. 矿业科学学报, 2021, 6(3): 261-270. doi: 10.19606/j.cnki.jmst.2021.03.002

    LIU S Q, CHANG Z B, LIU J C. Key technologies and prospect for in-situ gasification mining of deep coal resources[J]. Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 2021, 6(3): 261-270. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.19606/j.cnki.jmst.2021.03.002
    [6] 刘送永, 李洪盛, 江红祥, 等. 矿山煤岩破碎方法研究进展及展望[J]. 煤炭学报, 2023, 48(2): 1047-1069. doi: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2022.0733

    LIU S Y, LI H S, JIANG H X, et al. Research progress and prospect of coal-rock breaking methods in mines[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2023, 48(2): 1047-1069. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2022.0733
    [7] 王德余, 李根生, 史怀忠, 等. 高效破岩新方法进展与应用[J]. 石油机械, 2012, 40(6): 1-6. doi: 10.16082/j.cnki.issn.1001-4578.2012.06.004

    WANG D Y, LI G S, SHI H Z, et al. Progress of the high-efficiency rock-breaking method[J]. China Petroleum Machinery, 2012, 40(6): 1-6. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.16082/j.cnki.issn.1001-4578.2012.06.004
    [8] VAZHOV V F, ZHURKOV M Y, LOPATIN V V, et al. Electric-discharge cutting of rocks[J]. Journal of Mining Science, 2008, 44(2): 176-182. doi: 10.1007/s10913-008-0031-0
    [9] VAZHOV V F, GAFAROV R R, DATSKEVICH S Y, et al. Breakage of rocks by pulsed electric discharge at elevated pressures and temperatures[J]. Technical Physics Letters, 2011, 37(4): 383-386. doi: 10.1134/s1063785011040286
    [10] VAZHOV V F, DATSKVICH S Y, ZHURKOV M Y, et al. Electric pulse breakdown and rock fracture in a coupled environment of increased pressure and temperature[J]. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2014, 552(1): 012050.
    [11] 沈忠厚. 现代钻井技术发展趋势[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2005, 32(1): 89-91. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0747.2005.01.024

    SHEN Z H. Development trend of the modern drilling technology[J]. Petroleum Exploration & Development, 2005, 32(1): 89-91. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0747.2005.01.024
    [12] ZHU X H, HE L, LIU W J, et al. Experimental investigation on high voltage electric pulse rock breaking under drilling mud conditions[J]. Geoenergy Science and Engineering, 2024, 242: 213274. doi: 10.1016/j.geoen.2024.213274
    [13] SCHIEGG H O, RØDLAND A, ZHU G Z, et al. Electro-pulse-boring (EPB): Novel super-deep drilling technology for low cost electricity[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2015, 26(1): 37-46. doi: 10.1007/s12583-015-0519-x
    [14] TIMOSHKIN I V, MACKERSIE J W, MACGREGOR S J. Plasma channel miniature hole drilling technology[J]. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, 2004, 32(5): 2055-2061. doi: 10.1109/TPS.2004.835489
    [15] 祝效华, 罗云旭, 刘伟吉, 等. 等离子体电脉冲钻井破岩机理的电击穿实验与数值模拟方法[J]. 石油学报, 2020, 41(9): 1146-1162. doi: 10.7623/syxb202009011

    ZHU X H, LUO Y X, LIU W J, et al. Electrical breakdown experiment and numerical simulation method of rock-breaking mechanism of plasma electric pulse drilling[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(9): 1146-1162. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.7623/syxb202009011
    [16] BURKIN V V, KUZNETSOVA N S, LOPATIN V V. Dynamics of electro burst in solids: I. Power characteristics of electro burst[J]. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 2009, 42(18): 185204. doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/42/18/185204
    [17] DRABKINA S I. On the theory of development of the spark discharge channel[J]. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics, 1951, 21(4): 473-483.
    [18] BRAGINSKII S I. Theory of the development of a spark channel[J]. Soviet Physics JETP, 1958, 7(6): 1068-1074.
    [19] CHEN J Z, ELMI C, GOLDSBY D, et al. Generation of shock lamellae and melting in rocks by lightning-induced shock waves and electrical heating[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2017, 44(17): 8757-8768. doi: 10.1002/2017GL073843
    [20] LIU Q M, ZHANG Y M. Shock wave generated by high-energy electric spark discharge[J]. Journal of Applied Physics, 2014, 116(15): 153302. doi: 10.1063/1.4898141
    [21] 刘伟吉, 张有建, 祝效华, 等. 影响高压电脉冲破岩效率的关键因素分析[J]. 天然气工业, 2023, 43(10): 112-124. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2023.10.012

    LIU W J, ZHANG Y J, ZHU X H, et al. Key factors influencing rock breaking efficiency of high voltage electric pulse[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2023, 43(10): 112-124. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2023.10.012
    [22] 祝效华, 陈梦秋, 刘伟吉. 高压电脉冲破碎非均质花岗岩数值模拟[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 48(5): 151-159. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5005.2024.05.017

    ZHU X H, CHEN M Q, LIU W J. Numerical simulation of high-voltage electric pulses crushing heterogeneous granite[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Natural Science), 2024, 48(5): 151-159. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5005.2024.05.017
    [23] 祝效华, 刘伟吉, 张有建. 电极结构对高压电脉冲破岩机理的影响[J]. 特种油气藏, 2025, 32(3): 126-132. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2025.03.015

    ZHU X H, LIU W J, ZHANG Y J. Effeet of electrode structure on high-voltage electric pulse rock fragmentation mechanism[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2025, 32(3): 126-132. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2025.03.015
    [24] URKIN V V, KUZNETSOVA N S, LOPATIN V V. Analysis of mechanisms of rock destruction in electro-discharge drilling [J]. Russian Physics Journal, 2006, 49 (11): 507-510.
    [25] LOPATIN V V, NOSKOV M D, USMANOV G Z, et al. Modeling of impulse electric discharge propagation in a condensed dielectric[J]. Russian Physics Journal, 2006, 49(3): 243-250. doi: 10.1007/s11182-006-0097-6
    [26] 王博, 颜廷巍, 李欢, 等. 耦合相场与裂隙流方法的裂缝扩展−渗流一体化模拟[J]. 石油科学通报, 2025, 10(2): 192-205. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-1693.2025.02.011

    WANG B, YAN T W, LI H, et al. The integrated simulation of fracture propagation and seepage studied by using a coupled phase field and fracture flow method[J]. Petroleum Science Bulletin, 2025, 10(2): 192-205. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-1693.2025.02.011
    [27] MIEHE C, HOFACKER M, WELSCHINGER F. A phase field model for rate-independent crack propagation: Robust algorithmic implementation based on operator splits[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2010, 199(45/46/47/48): 2765-2778. doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2010.04.011
    [28] FRANCFORT G A, MARIGO J J. Revisiting brittle fracture as an energy minimization problem[J]. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 1998, 46(8): 1319-1342. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5096(98)00034-9
    [29] MIEHE C, WELSCHINGER F, HOFACKER M. Thermodynamically consistent phase-field models of fracture: Variational principles and multi-field FE implementations[J]. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2010, 83(10): 1273-1311. doi: 10.1002/nme.2861
    [30] BORDEN M J, VERHOOSEL C V, SCOTT M A, et al. A phase-field description of dynamic brittle fracture[J]. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2012, 217/218/219/220: 77-95.
    [31] SHIOZAWA S, LEE S, WHEELER M F. The effect of stress boundary conditions on fluid-driven fracture propagation in porous media using a phase-field modeling approach[J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2019, 43(6): 1316-1340. doi: 10.1002/nag.2899
    [32] LI C P, DUAN L C, TAN S C, et al. Influences on high-voltage electro pulse boring in granite[J]. Energies, 2018, 11(9): 2461. doi: 10.3390/en11092461
    [33] TIMOSHKIN I V, FOURACRE R A, GIVEN M J, et al. Hydrodynamic modelling of transient cavities in fluids generated by high voltage spark discharges[J]. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 2006, 39(22): 4808. doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/39/22/011
    [34] 刘毅, 廖洪彬, 程晋, 等. 脉冲放电破岩等离子体通道长度预测方法[J]. 强激光与粒子束, 2024, 36(5): 055021. doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202436.230432

    LIU Y, LIAO H B, CHENG J, et al. Method for predicting plasma channel length for rock breaking by pulsed discharge[J]. High Power Laser and Particle Beams, 2024, 36(5): 055021. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.11884/HPLPB202436.230432
    [35] XIONG J M, LI L, DAI H Y, et al. The development of shock wave overpressure driven by channel expansion of high current impulse discharge arc[J]. Physics of Plasmas, 2018, 25(3): 032115. doi: 10.1063/1.5013296
    [36] 章志成. 高压脉冲放电破碎岩石及钻井装备研制[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2013.

    ZHANG Z C. Rock fragmentation by pulsed high voltage discharge and drilling equipment development[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2013. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [37] MACQUORN RANKINE W J. On the thermodynamic theory of waves of finite longitudinal disturbance[M]. New York: Springer New York, 1998: 133-148.
    [38] 汤文辉, 张若棋. 物态方程理论及计算概论[M]. 2版. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2008.

    TANG W H, ZHANG R Q. Introduction to theory and calculation of equation of state[M]. 2nd ed. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2008. (in Chinese)
    [39] 欧阳昢晧. 高压电脉冲−水力压裂联合破岩力学性状演化规律研究[D]. 上海: 上海理工大学, 2023.

    OUYANG P H. Mechanical property evolution of rock under high-voltage electropulse-assisted hydraulic fracturing[D]. Shanghai: University of Shanghai for Science & Technology, 2023. (in Chinese with English abstract)
    [40] LEE J, LACY T E JR, PITTMAN C U JR, et al. Numerical estimations of lightning-induced mechanical damage in carbon/epoxy composites using shock wave overpressure and equivalent air blast overpressure[J]. Composite Structures, 2019, 224: 111039. doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111039
    [41] 饶平平, 冯伟康, 崔纪飞, 等. 考虑多场耦合高压电脉冲作用下岩体破碎响应[J]. 工程科学与技术, 2024, 56(6): 93-102. doi: 10.15961/j.jsuese.202300173

    RAO P P, FENG W K, CUI J F, et al. Response of rock breaking by high-voltage electrical pulse considering multi-field coupling[J]. Advanced Engineering Sciences, 2024, 56(6): 93-102. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.15961/j.jsuese.202300173
    [42] 刘伟吉, 张有建, 罗云旭, 等. 岩石内部高压电脉冲等离子体通道生成机理[J]. 石油学报, 2023, 44(4): 684-697. doi: 10.7623/syxb202304010

    LIU W J, ZHANG Y J, LUO Y X, et al. Generation mechanism of plasma channels for high-voltage electric pulses in rock[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2023, 44(4): 684-697. (in Chinese with English abstract) doi: 10.7623/syxb202304010
  • 加载中
图(16) / 表(1)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  242
  • PDF下载量:  17
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2025-06-25
  • 录用日期:  2025-12-22
  • 修回日期:  2025-12-05
  • 网络出版日期:  2025-12-22

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回

    温馨提示:近日,有不明身份人员冒充本刊编辑部或编委会给作者发送邮件,以论文质量核查等为由,要求作者添加微信。请作者提高警惕,认准编辑部官方邮箱、电话和QQ群,注意甄别虚假信息,谨防上当受骗。如有疑问,可及时联系编辑部核实。

     《地质科技通报》编辑部