留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

孔雀河灌区土壤盐分遥感反演模型及空间分布特征

张冲 孙志坚 彭博锐 刘延锋

张冲,孙志坚,彭博锐,等. 孔雀河灌区土壤盐分遥感反演模型及空间分布特征[J]. 地质科技通报,2026,45(4):1-10 doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20250185
引用本文: 张冲,孙志坚,彭博锐,等. 孔雀河灌区土壤盐分遥感反演模型及空间分布特征[J]. 地质科技通报,2026,45(4):1-10 doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20250185
ZHANG Chong,SUN Zhijian,PENG Borui,et al. Remote sensing inversion model and spatial distribution characteristics of soil salinity in the Kongque River irrigation area[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology,2026,45(4):1-10 doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20250185
Citation: ZHANG Chong,SUN Zhijian,PENG Borui,et al. Remote sensing inversion model and spatial distribution characteristics of soil salinity in the Kongque River irrigation area[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology,2026,45(4):1-10 doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20250185

孔雀河灌区土壤盐分遥感反演模型及空间分布特征

doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20250185
基金项目: 国家自然科学基金项目(42272306)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    张冲:E-mail:20181004366@cug.edu.cn

    通讯作者:

    E-mail:liuyf@cug.edu.cn

  • 中图分类号: S151.9;X53

Remote sensing inversion model and spatial distribution characteristics of soil salinity in the Kongque River irrigation area

More Information
  • 摘要:

    干旱地区土壤盐渍化问题突出,快速精准监测土壤盐分对区域生态保护与农业可持续发展至关重要。为提高干旱区土壤盐分遥感反演精度,以孔雀河灌区为研究区,结合实地调查点位采集土壤样品,基于ASD FieldSpec 4地物光谱仪实测土壤高光谱数据校正Landsat 8卫星遥感数据,利用校正后的光谱指数通过随机森林算法构建土壤盐分遥感反演模型来估计孔雀河灌区表层土壤盐分。结果表明:土壤光谱反射率随盐渍化程度加重呈递增趋势;经ASD高光谱校正后部分盐分指数与土壤盐分相关性显著提高;随机森林算法构建土壤盐分遥感反演模型,建模集R2为0.847,验证集R2为0.713,比原始数据建模集和验证集的R2显著提高;孔雀河灌区西部土壤盐渍化最严重,自WS向EN土壤盐渍化程度逐渐减小,南部地区以轻、中度盐渍土为主,中、北部地区主要为非盐渍土。基于高光谱校正的随机森林反演模型精度良好,可为孔雀河灌区及同类干旱区土壤盐渍化动态监测提供可靠技术支撑。

     

  • 图 1  孔雀河灌区野外调查点图

    Figure 1.  Distribution of field survey points in Kongque River irrigation area

    图 2  土壤电导率EC1:5与ECFS关系图

    Figure 2.  Relationship between EC1:5 and ECFS

    图 3  不同盐渍化程度土壤反射率

    Figure 3.  Soil reflectance under different salinization degrees

    图 4  RASD与Landsat 8卫星B5波段反射率($R_{{\mathrm{L}}{\text{-}}{\mathrm{B}}_5} $)散点图

    $R_{{\mathrm{ASD}}{\text{-}}{\mathrm{B}}_5} $. ASD重采样后对应的Landsat 8波段B5反射率

    Figure 4.  Scatter plot of B5-band reflectance for RASD and Landsat 8

    图 5  土壤遥感反演模型(a)与克里金插值(b)反演土壤盐渍化

    Figure 5.  Soil salinization maps derived from soil remote sensing inversion model (a) and Kriging interpolation (b)

    表  1  盐分、植被指数

    Table  1.   Salinity and vegetation indices

    计算公式 参考文献
    盐分指数 BI (B42+B52)0.5 [30]
    NDSI (B4−B5)/(B4+B5)
    SI (B2B4)0.5
    SI11 B6/B7 [31]
    ASTER (B6−B7)/(B6+B7)
    IS-VIR 2B3−(B4+B5)
    S1 B2/B4 [32]
    S2 (B2−B4)/(B2+B4)
    S3 B3B4/B2
    S4 (B2B4)0.5
    S5 B2B4/B3
    S6 B4B5/B3
    SI1 (B3B4)0.5 [33]
    SI2 (B32+B42+B52)0.5
    SI3 (B42+B32)0.5
    INT1 (B3+B4)/2
    INT2 (B3+B4+B5)/2
    植被指数 SRI B5/B4 [34]
    NDVI (B5−B4)/(B5+B4)
    NDWI (B3−B5)/(B3+B5)
    EVI 2.5[(B5−B4)/(B5+6B4−7.5B2+1)] [35]
    DVI B5−B4
    TVI 0.5[(120(B5−B3)-200(B4−B3)]
    SRVI (1+L) (B5−B4)/(B5+B4+L)
    MSAVI 0.5{2B5−1-[(2B5+1)2-8(B5−B4)]0.5} [36]
    ARVI [B5−(2B4−B2)]/(B5+2B4−B2) [37]
    GRVI B5/B3 [38]
    ENDVI (B5+B7−B4)/(B5+B7+B4) [39]
    ERVI (B5+B7)/B4
    EDVI B5+B6−B4
    GNDVI (B5−B3)/(B5+B3) [40]
    GDVI (B52−B42)/(B52+B42) [41]
    NLI (B52−B4)/(B52+B4)
    OSAVI 1.16(B5−B4)/(B5+B4+0.16)
      注:BI. 亮度指数;NDSI. 归一化盐度指数;ASTER.ASTER. 盐度指数;IS-VIR. 可见光−红外盐度指数;SI,SI11,S1,S2,S3,S4,S5,S6,SI1,SI2,SI3. 盐度指数;INT1,INT2. 交互指数;SRI. 盐度比值指数;NDVI. 归一化植被指数;NDWI. 归一化水体指数;EVI. 增强型植被指数;DVI. 差值植被指数;TVI. 三角植被指数;SRVI. 土壤调整植被指数;MSAVI. 修正型土壤调整植被指数;ARVI. 大气阻抗植被指数;GRVI. 绿度比值植被指数;ENDVI. 增强型归一化差异植被指数;ERVI. 增强型比值植被指数;EDVI. 增强型差值植被指数;GNDVI. 绿度归一化植被指数;GDVI. 绿度差值植被指数;NLI. 归一化叶面积指数;OSAVI. 优化土壤调整植被指数;B2,B3,B4,B5,B6,B7分别为Landsat 8卫星波段反射率;L为土壤调节因素,一般取0.5;下同
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  土壤盐分与盐分指数和植被指数皮尔逊相关性

    Table  2.   Pearson correlation of soil salinity with salinity indices and vegetation indices

    盐分指数 相关系数 植被指数 相关系数
    BI 0.014 SRI −0.138
    SI 0.082 NDVI −0.183
    SI1 0.098 EVI −0.209*
    SI2 0.033 DVI −0.206*
    SI3 0.101 TVI −0.221*
    S1 −0.266** SRVI −0.195
    S2 −0.270** MSAVI −0.193
    S3 0.155 ARVI −0.209*
    S4 0.099 NDWI 0.149
    S5 0.086 GRVI −0.127
    S6 −0.002 ENDVI −0.102
    NDSI 0.183 ERVI −0.102
    SI11 −0.185 EDVI −0.067
    ASTER −0.202* GNDVI −0.149
    IS-VIR 0.108 GDVI −0.202
    INT1 0.099 NLI −0.184
    INT2 0.051 OSAVI −0.189
      注:*表示显著性检验p<0.05;**表示p<0.01。
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  RASD,Landsat 8波段与土壤盐分的皮尔逊相关性

    Table  3.   Pearson correlation of soil salinity with RASD and Landsat 8 bands

    波段来源 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7
    Landsat 8 0.038 0.075 0.128 −0.094 0.132 0.185
    RASD −0.252 −0.241 −0.244 −0.313* −0.382** −0.383**
      注:*表示显著性检验p<0.05;**表示p<0.01;RASD. ASD所测反射率;下同
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  RASD与Landsat 8各波段皮尔逊相关性

    Table  4.   Pearson correlation between RASD and Landsat 8 bands

    波段 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7
    皮尔逊相关性 0.168 0.223 0.206 0.545** 0.140 0.067
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  5  校正前后部分盐分指数皮尔逊相关系数

    Table  5.   Pearson correlation coefficients of selected salinity indices before and after correction

    盐分指数 校正前 校正后
    BI 0.014 0.192
    SI2 0.033 0.184
    S6 −0.002 0.225*
    IS-VIR 0.108 −0.190
    NDSI 0.183 −0.083
    INT2 0.051 0.182
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  6  土壤盐分遥感反演模型精度统计表

    Table  6.   Accuracy statistics of remote sensing inversion models for soil salinity

    建模指数 建模集 验证集
    R2 RMSE/(dS·m−1) R2 RMSE/(dS·m−1) RPD
    EVI,DVI,TVI,ARVI,S1,S2,ASTER 0.833 1.703 0.528 2.812 1,496
    EVI,DVI,TVI,ARVI,S1,S2,S6,ASTER 0.847 1.630 0.713 2.246 1.873
      注:R2. 决定系数;RMSE. 均方根误差;RPD. 相对分析误差
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 李建国, 濮励杰, 朱明, 等. 土壤盐渍化研究现状及未来研究热点[J]. 地理学报, 2012, 67(9): 1233-1245.

    LI J G, PU L J, ZHU M, et al. The present situation and hot issues in the salt-affected soil research[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2012, 67(9): 1233-1245. (in Chinese with English abstract
    [2] SINGH A. Soil salinization management for sustainable development: A review[J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2021, 277: 111383. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111383
    [3] 杨劲松, 姚荣江, 王相平, 等. 中国盐渍土研究: 历程、现状与展望[J]. 土壤学报, 2022, 59(1): 10-27. doi: 10.11766/trxb202110270578

    YANG J S, YAO R J, WANG X P, et al. Research on salt-affected soils in China: History, status quo and prospect[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2022, 59(1): 10-27. (in Chinese with English abstract doi: 10.11766/trxb202110270578
    [4] SMITH P, POCH R M, LOBB D A, et al. Status of the world's soils[J]. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 2024, 49: 73-104. doi: 10.1146/annurev-environ-030323-075629
    [5] DARVISHZADEH R, ATZBERGER C, SKIDMORE A K, et al. Leaf Area Index derivation from hyperspectral vegetation indicesand the red edge position[J]. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2009, 30(23): 6199-6218. doi: 10.1080/01431160902842342
    [6] 刘新, 郝媛媛, 花立民. 石羊河下游民勤盆地土壤盐分空间分异特征[J]. 干旱区研究, 2023, 40(10): 1615-1624. doi: 10.13866/j.azr.2023.10.08

    LIU X, HAO Y Y, HUA L M. Spatial differentiation characteristics of soil salinity in Minqin Basin, downstream of Shiyang River, China[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2023, 40(10): 1615-1624. (in Chinese with English abstract doi: 10.13866/j.azr.2023.10.08
    [7] 王敬哲, 丁建丽, 葛翔宇, 等. 基于星地传感技术的土壤盐渍化监测进展与展望[J]. 遥感学报, 2024, 28(9): 2187-2208.

    WANG J Z, DING J L, GE X Y, et al. Monitoring soil salinization on the basis of remote sensing and proximal soil sensing: Progress and perspective[J]. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 2024, 28(9): 2187-2208. (in Chinese with English abstract
    [8] 杨宁, 崔文轩, 张智韬, 等. 无人机多光谱遥感反演不同深度土壤盐分[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(22): 13-21. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2020.22.002

    YANG N, CUI W X, ZHANG Z T, et al. Soil salinity inversion at different depths using improved spectral index with UAV multispectral remote sensing[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2020, 36(22): 13-21. (in Chinese with English abstract doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2020.22.002
    [9] SHOKRI N, HASSANI A, SAHIMI M. Multi-scale soil salinization dynamics from global to pore scale: A review[J]. Reviews of Geophysics, 2024, 62(4): e2023RG000804. doi: 10.1029/2023RG000804
    [10] 刘福全, 杜崇, 韩旭, 等. 基于3S技术的大庆地区土壤盐渍化时空变化分析[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2022, 41(5): 132-138. doi: 10.13522/j.cnki.ggps.2021494

    LIU F Q, DU C, HAN X, et al. Spatiotemporal variation in soil salinization in Daqing calculated using the 3S technology[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2022, 41(5): 132-138. (in Chinese with English abstract doi: 10.13522/j.cnki.ggps.2021494
    [11] 谭世林, 胡雪菲, 岳胜如. 塔里木河流域绿洲土壤盐分遥感反演模型研究[J]. 测绘与空间地理信息, 2022, 45(6): 78-81. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5867.2022.06.023

    TAN S L, HU X F, YUE S R. Remote sensing retrieval model of soil salinity in oasis of Tarim River Basin[J]. Geomatics & Spatial Information Technology, 2022, 45(6): 78-81. (in Chinese with English abstract doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5867.2022.06.023
    [12] 付萍杰, 补沅坤, 马池杰, 等. 基于GEE的黄河三角洲地区土壤含盐量时空反演[J]. 测绘通报, 2024(11): 13-20. doi: 10.13474/j.cnki.11-2246.2024.1103

    FU P J, BU Y K, MA C J, et al. Spatio-temporal inversion of soil salinity in the Yellow River Delta region based on GEE[J]. Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping, 2024(11): 13-20. (in Chinese with English abstract doi: 10.13474/j.cnki.11-2246.2024.1103
    [13] YE H J, TANG S L, BAI Y, et al. Estimation of sea surface salinity from MODIS-Aqua data in the northern South China Sea[J]. Regional Studies in Marine Science, 2024, 77: 103684. doi: 10.1016/j.rsma.2024.103684
    [14] HE Y J, YIN H Y, CHEN Y W, et al. Soil salinity estimation based on sentinel-1/2 texture features and machine learning[J]. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2024, 24(9): 15302-15310. doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2024.3377682
    [15] 姚远, 丁建丽, 张芳, 等. 基于高光谱指数和电磁感应技术的区域土壤盐渍化监测模型[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2013, 33(6): 1658-1664.

    YAO Y, DING J L, ZHANG F, et al. Research on model of soil salinization monitoring based on hyperspectral index and EM38[J]. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2013, 33(6): 1658-1664. (in Chinese with English abstract
    [16] 孙亚楠, 李仙岳, 史海滨, 等. 基于多源数据融合的盐分遥感反演与季节差异性研究[J]. 农业机械学报, 2020, 51(6): 169-180.

    SUN Y N, LI X Y, SHI H B, et al. Remote sensing inversion of soil salinity and seasonal difference analysis based on multi-source data fusion[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2020, 51(6): 169-180. (in Chinese with English abstract
    [17] 张贤龙, 张飞, 张海威, 等. 基于光谱变换的高光谱指数土壤盐分反演模型优选[J]. 农业工程学报, 2018, 34(1): 110-117. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2018.01.015

    ZHANG X L, ZHANG F, ZHANG H W, et al. Optimization of soil salt inversion model based on spectral transformation from hyperspectral index[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2018, 34(1): 110-117. (in Chinese with English abstract doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2018.01.015
    [18] 张孟, 韦玮, 张艳娜, 等. Hyperion高光谱遥感器的在轨自动化定标[J]. 光学学报, 2019, 39(5): 0528002. doi: 10.3788/AOS201939.0528002

    ZHANG M, WEI W, ZHANG Y N, et al. On-orbit automated calibration of Hyperion hyperspectral remote sensor[J]. Acta Optica Sinica, 2019, 39(5): 0528002. (in Chinese with English abstract doi: 10.3788/AOS201939.0528002
    [19] 马驰. 基于HJ1A-HSI反演松嫩平原土壤盐分含量[J]. 干旱区研究, 2014, 31(2): 226-230.

    MA C. Quantitative retrieval of soil salt content in the Songnen Plain based on HJ1A-HSI images[J]. Arid Zone Research, 2014, 31(2): 226-230. (in Chinese with English abstract
    [20] THENKABAIL P S, ENCLONA E A, ASHTON M S, et al. Hyperion, IKONOS, ALI, and ETM+ sensors in the study of African rainforests[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2004, 90(1): 23-43. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2003.11.018
    [21] KATTENBORN T, MAACK J, FAßNACHT F, et al. Mapping forest biomass from space: Fusion of hyperspectral EO1-Hyperion data and Tandem-X and WorldView-2 canopy height models[J]. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2015, 35: 359-367. doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2014.10.008
    [22] 厉彦玲, 赵庚星, 常春艳, 等. OLI与HSI影像融合的土壤盐分反演模型[J]. 农业工程学报, 2017, 33(21): 173-180.

    LI Y L, ZHAO G X, CHANG C Y, et al. Soil salinity retrieval model based on OLI and HSI image fusion[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2017, 33(21): 173-180. (in Chinese with English abstract
    [23] 刘知, 李彦星, 杨波, 等. 山西省中条山中北段遥感示矿信息提取与区块优选[J]. 地质科技通报, 2026, 45(2): 274-292. doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20240617

    LIU Z, LI Y X, YANG B, et al. Extraction of remote sensing ore-indicating information and block optimization in middle-northern segment of Zhongtiao Mountain, Shanxi Province[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2026, 45(2): 274-292. (in Chinese with English abstract doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20240617
    [24] 孙亚楠, 李仙岳, 史海滨, 等. 基于高光谱数据的盐荒地和耕地土壤盐分遥感反演优化[J]. 农业工程学报, 2022, 38(23): 101-111.

    SUN Y N, LI X Y, SHI H B, et al. Optimizing the inversion of soil salt in salinized wasteland using hyperspectral data from remote sensing[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2022, 38(23): 101-111. (in Chinese with English abstract
    [25] 周世勋, 尹娟, 王军涛, 等. 灌区土壤含盐量的高光谱估测与空间分布研究[J]. 灌溉排水学报, 2025, 44(2): 72-82. doi: 10.13522/j.cnki.ggps.2024066

    ZHOU S X, YIN J, WANG J T, et al. Mapping soil salinity in irrigated areas using hyperspectral UAV imagery[J]. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 2025, 44(2): 72-82. (in Chinese with English abstract doi: 10.13522/j.cnki.ggps.2024066
    [26] 张茗惠, 张峻华, 盛统民, 等. 微咸水膜下滴灌棉花根系时空分布规律及三维动态生长模拟[J]. 地质科技通报, 2026, 45(1): 279-290. doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20240155

    ZHANG M H, ZHANG J H, SHENG T M, et al. Spatial-temporal distribution patterns of cotton root system under brackish water mulched drip irrigation and three-dimensional dynamic growth simulation[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2026, 45(1): 279-290. (in Chinese with English abstract doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20240155
    [27] WICKE B, SMEETS E, DORNBURG V, et al. The global technical and economic potential of bioenergy from salt-affected soils[J]. Energy & Environmental Science, 2011, 4(8): 2669-2681. doi: 10.1039/C1EE01029H
    [28] 曹肖奕, 丁建丽, 葛翔宇, 等. 基于不同卫星光谱模拟的土壤电导率估算研究[J]. 干旱区地理, 2020, 43(1): 172-181. doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2020.01.20

    CAO X Y, DING J L, GE X Y, et al. Estimation of soil conductivity based on spectral simulation of different satellites[J]. Arid Land Geography, 2020, 43(1): 172-181. (in Chinese with English abstract doi: 10.12118/j.issn.1000-6060.2020.01.20
    [29] KHAN N M, RASTOSKUEV V V, SATO Y, et al. Assessment of hydrosaline land degradation by using a simple approach of remote sensing indicators[J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2005, 77(1/2/3): 96-109. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2004.09.038
    [30] TRIKI FOURATI H, BOUAZIZ M, BENZINA M, et al. Modeling of soil salinity within a semi-arid region using spectral analysis[J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 2015, 8(12): 11175-11182. doi: 10.1007/s12517-015-2004-3
    [31] 姚志华, 陈俊英, 张智韬, 等. 覆膜对无人机多光谱遥感反演土壤含盐量精度的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2019, 35(19): 89-97.

    YAO Z H, CHEN J Y, ZHANG Z T, et al. Effect of plastic film mulching on soil salinity inversion by using UAV multispectral remote sensing[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2019, 35(19): 89-97. (in Chinese with English abstract
    [32] EL KADER DOUAOUI A, NICOLAS H, WALTER C. Detecting salinity hazards within a semiarid context by means of combining soil and remote-sensing data[J]. Geoderma, 2006, 134(1/2): 217-230. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2005.10.009
    [33] SCUDIERO E, SKAGGS T H, CORWIN D L. Regional scale soil salinity evaluation using Landsat 7, western San Joaquin Valley, California, USA[J]. Geoderma Regional, 2014, 2/3: 82-90.
    [34] 张智韬, 杜瑜燕, 劳聪聪, 等. 基于雷达遥感的不同深度土壤含盐量反演模型[J]. 农业机械学报, 2020, 51(10): 243-251. doi: 10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2020.10.027

    ZHANG Z T, DU Y Y, LAO C C, et al. Inversion model of soil salt content in different depths based on radar remote sensing[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2020, 51(10): 243-251. (in Chinese with English abstract doi: 10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2020.10.027
    [35] CHO K H, BEON M S, JEONG J C. Dynamics of soil salinity and vegetation in a reclaimed area in Saemangeum, Republic of Korea[J]. Geoderma, 2018, 321: 42-51. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.01.031
    [36] 冯娟, 丁建丽, 杨爱霞, 等. 干旱区土壤盐渍化信息遥感建模[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2018, 36(1): 266-273. doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1000-7601.2018.01.39

    FENG J, DING J L, YANG A X, et al. Remote sensing modeling of soil salinization information in arid areas[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2018, 36(1): 266-273. (in Chinese with English abstract doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1000-7601.2018.01.39
    [37] 奚雪, 赵庚星, 高鹏, 等. 基于Sentinel卫星及无人机多光谱的滨海冬小麦种植区土壤盐分反演研究: 以黄三角垦利区为例[J]. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(24): 5005-5016. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.24.004

    XI X, ZHAO G X, GAO P, et al. Inversion of soil salinity in coastal winter wheat growing area based on sentinel satellite and unmanned aerial vehicle multi-spectrum: A case study in Kenli district of the Yellow River Delta[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2020, 53(24): 5005-5016. (in Chinese with English abstract doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2020.24.004
    [38] 陈红艳, 赵庚星, 陈敬春, 等. 基于改进植被指数的黄河口区盐渍土盐分遥感反演[J]. 农业工程学报, 2015, 31(5): 107-114. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2015.05.016

    CHEN H Y, ZHAO G X, CHEN J C, et al. Remote sensing inversion of saline soil salinity based on modified vegetation index in estuary area of Yellow River[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2015, 31(5): 107-114. (in Chinese with English abstract doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-6819.2015.05.016
    [39] GITELSON A A, KAUFMAN Y J, MERZLYAK M N. Use of a green channel in remote sensing of global vegetation from EOS-MODIS[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 1996, 58(3): 289-298. doi: 10.1016/S0034-4257(96)00072-7
    [40] QI Z W, XIAO C L, WANG G, et al. Study on ecological threshold of groundwater in typical salinization area of Qian'an County[J]. Water, 2021, 13(6): 856. doi: 10.3390/w13060856
    [41] BREIMAN L. Random forests[J]. Machine Learning, 2001, 45(1): 5-32. doi: 10.1023/A:1010933404324
    [42] 王怡婧, 贾萍萍, 陈睿华, 等. 多源遥感对宁夏干湿季土壤含盐量敏感性分析与定量反演[J]. 生态学杂志, 2023, 42(9): 2286-2295. doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202309.006

    WANG Y J, JIA P P, CHEN R H, et al. Sensitivity analysis and quantitative inversion of multi-source remote sensing to soil salt content in dry and wet seasons in Ningxia[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2023, 42(9): 2286-2295. (in Chinese with English abstract doi: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202309.006
    [43] 王飞, 丁建丽, 魏阳, 等. 基于Landsat系列数据的盐分指数和植被指数对土壤盐度变异性的响应分析: 以新疆天山南北典型绿洲为例[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(15): 5007-5022.

    WANG F, DING J L, WEI Y, et al. Sensitivity analysis of soil salinity and vegetation indices to detect soil salinity variation by using Landsat series images: Applications in different oases in Xinjiang, China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(15): 5007-5022. (in Chinese with English abstract
    [44] 谷海斌, 王泽, 武红旗, 等. 不同开垦年限土壤养分和盐分时空分布特征研究[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2016, 34(3): 8-15. doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1000-7601.2016.03.02

    GU H B, WANG Z, WU H Q, et al. Research on temporal and spatial distribution characteristics of soil nutrient and salt under different reclamation years[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2016, 34(3): 8-15. (in Chinese with English abstract doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1000-7601.2016.03.02
    [45] 张雪, 陈耀轩, 张盼, 等. 孔雀河流域农业灌区土壤盐分空间分布及变异特征[J]. 土壤, 2016, 48(6): 1223-1228. doi: 10.13758/j.cnki.tr.2016.06.023

    ZHANG X, CHEN Y X, ZHANG P, et al. Soil salinity spatial distribution and variation characteristics in irrigated land of Kongque River Basin[J]. Soils, 2016, 48(6): 1223-1228. (in Chinese with English abstract doi: 10.13758/j.cnki.tr.2016.06.023
  • 加载中
图(5) / 表(6)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  18
  • PDF下载量:  1
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2025-04-23
  • 录用日期:  2025-06-30
  • 修回日期:  2025-06-26
  • 网络出版日期:  2025-06-30

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回

    温馨提示:近日,有不明身份人员冒充本刊编辑部或编委会给作者发送邮件,以论文质量核查等为由,要求作者添加微信。请作者提高警惕,认准编辑部官方邮箱、电话和QQ群,注意甄别虚假信息,谨防上当受骗。如有疑问,可及时联系编辑部核实。

     《地质科技通报》编辑部