留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

鄂尔多斯盆地北部盆缘过渡带致密砂岩气成藏动力机制

齐荣 曹强 张威 马奔奔 陆永潮 叶加仁 安川 李春堂 张悦辉 时永僖

齐荣,曹强,张威,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地北部盆缘过渡带致密砂岩气成藏动力机制[J]. 地质科技通报,2026,45(3):1-16 doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20240519
引用本文: 齐荣,曹强,张威,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地北部盆缘过渡带致密砂岩气成藏动力机制[J]. 地质科技通报,2026,45(3):1-16 doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20240519
QI Rong,CAO Qiang,ZHANG Wei,et al. Dynamic mechanism of tight sandstone gas accumulation in northern basin-margin transition zone of Ordos Basin[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology,2026,45(3):1-16 doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20240519
Citation: QI Rong,CAO Qiang,ZHANG Wei,et al. Dynamic mechanism of tight sandstone gas accumulation in northern basin-margin transition zone of Ordos Basin[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology,2026,45(3):1-16 doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20240519

鄂尔多斯盆地北部盆缘过渡带致密砂岩气成藏动力机制

doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20240519
基金项目: 中国石化科技部项目:鄂尔多斯盆地南部古生界构造−沉积演化及成藏条件研究(P24008);中国石油化工股份有限公司华北油气分公司项目:鄂尔多斯盆地南部古生界原型盆地恢复与成藏条件研究(34550000-24-ZC0611-0011);中国地质大学(武汉)构造与油气资源教育部重点实验室2022年度开放基金:盆缘过渡带先成型致密砂岩气富集动力学机理−以鄂尔多斯盆地北缘东胜气田为例(TPR-2022-09);中国石油化工股份有限公司华北油气分公司横向课题:彬长地区上古生界流体包裹体测试与成藏演化实验(34550000-24-FW2022-0059);湖北省自然科学基金地质创新发展联合基金项目:鄂西地区二叠系页岩气储层古压力恢复及成因机制(2024AFD396)
详细信息
    作者简介:

    齐荣:E-mail:qirong.hbsj@sinopec.com

    通讯作者:

    E-mail:qcao@cug.edu.cn

Dynamic mechanism of tight sandstone gas accumulation in northern basin-margin transition zone of Ordos Basin

More Information
  • 摘要:

    鄂尔多斯盆地北部盆−缘过渡带杭锦旗新召东区带二叠系盒一段准连续型致密砂岩气藏为现阶段勘探主要对象,勘探证实新召东区盒一段砂岩储层多已高度致密化,但仍可形成大规模天然气的充注成藏,本研究旨在查明主成藏期成藏动阻力耦合机制及其控藏效应,揭示鄂尔多斯盆地北部盆缘过渡带致密砂岩气成藏动力机制。以成藏动力学理论为指导,综合利用储层岩石学、成藏年代学及盆地模拟技术,分析新召东区带盒一段储层致密化与天然气成藏时序关系类型,定量重建致密砂岩储层的充注动力−阻力演化过程,总结主成藏期致密砂岩气成藏动阻力耦合机制及其控藏效应。研究表明,新召东区带盒一段主体为致密储层,发育压实主导致密型与石英胶结主导致密型2种成因的致密砂岩储层及1类溶蚀主导未致密型储层;天然气主成藏期为距今110~100 Ma的早白垩世末,天然气以CO2和CH4混合充注为特征;2种成因的致密砂岩储层都表现为“先致密后成藏”,且主成藏期天然气成藏动力大于阻力。净成藏动力(动力与阻力差值)大于7 MPa是杭锦旗地区新召东区带盒一段储层天然气富集的必要条件,高净成藏动力和良好封堵条件是杭锦旗新召东区天然气富集关键因素。

     

  • 图 1  杭锦旗地区构造单元划分与综合柱状图(据中石化华北油气分公司2018年资料修改)

    (a)构造区划图;(b)杭锦旗工区位置示意图;(c)单井地层综合柱状图

    Figure 1.  Structural unit division and comprehensive stratigraphic column of Hangjinqi area

    图 2  杭锦旗新召东区带盒1段颗粒组分含量三角图(a)、孔-渗交会图(b)、孔-渗频率分布直方图(c, d)、岩相类型与磨圆度频率分布直方图(e, f)

    Figure 2.  Ternary diagram of grain component content (a), porosity-permeability cross plot (b), frequency distribution histograms of porosity and permeability (c, d), and frequency distribution histograms of lithofacies type and roundness (e, f) of first member of Shihezi Formation in Xinzhao East Zone, Hangjinqi area

    图 3  杭锦旗新召东区带盒一段储集空间类型

    a. 锦151井,3534.7 m,岩屑颗粒溶蚀铸模孔;b. 锦59井,3528.2 m,岩屑颗粒溶蚀形成次生孔隙;c. 锦152井,3451 m,长石沿解理溶蚀;d. 锦152井,3449.84 m,高岭石晶间孔;e. 锦152井,3449.84 m,高岭石晶间孔;f. 锦30井,3461.46 m,石英颗粒压裂缝

    Figure 3.  Reservoir space types of first member of Shihezi Formation in Xinzhao East Zone, Hangjinqi area

    图 4  反演回剥法恢复杭锦旗新召东区带致密砂岩各成岩阶段储层孔隙度与渗透率(Δϕ. 储层孔隙度变化)

    Figure 4.  Porosity and permeability of tight sandstone reservoirs at different diagenetic stages in Xinzhao East Zone, Hangjinqi area restored by inverse back-stripping method

    图 5  杭锦旗新召东区带致密化主控因素

    a. 压实主导致密型成岩改造模式图;b. 石英胶结主导致密型成岩改造模式图;c. 裂缝−溶蚀主导未致密型成岩改造模式图

    Figure 5.  Main controlling factors of densification in Xinzhao East Zone, Hangjinqi area

    图 6  杭锦旗新召地区锦62井成藏事件图

    Permian. 二叠纪;Triassic:三叠纪;U Tri.上三叠统;Jurassic. 侏罗纪;L Jur. 下侏罗统;Cretaceous. 白垩纪;Lower Cretaceous. 下白垩统;U Crt. 上白垩统;Paleogene. 古近纪;Eocene. 始新世;Neog. 新近纪;Mio. 中新世;Q4. 第四系;K1z. 白垩系志丹群;J2a. 侏罗系安定组;J2z. 侏罗系直罗组;J1y. 侏罗系延安组;T3y. 三叠系延长组;T2e. 三叠系二马营组合延长组;T1h. 叠系和尚沟组;T1l. 三叠系刘家沟组;P2sh. 二叠系上石盒子组合石千峰组;P1x2. 二叠系下石盒子组二段;C3t. 石炭系太原组;下同

    Figure 6.  Accumulation event chart of Well Jin 62 in Xinzhao zone, Hangjinqi area

    图 7  杭锦旗地区新召东区带代表井盒一段储层流体包裹体显微特征

    a. 锦151井,3534.7 m,石英颗粒内纯气相包裹体;b. 锦59井,3528.2 m,石英内裂纹内条带状展布纯气相包裹体;c.锦62井,3461 m,石英内裂纹内条带状展布纯气相包裹体;d.锦30井,3461.46 m,石英颗粒内气液两相包裹体

    Figure 7.  Microscopic characteristics of fluid inclusions in first member of Shihezi Formation of representative wells in Xinzhao East Zone, Hangjinqi area

    图 8  杭锦旗新召东区带锦30井盒一段储层流体包裹体及其激光拉曼光谱特征

    a. 石英颗粒内气液两相包裹体,特征峰2249 cm−12947 cm−1,表明该包裹体中气体为N2和CH4混合气,伴生盐水包裹体测温124~129℃;b. 石英颗粒内气液两相包裹体,特征峰1456 cm−12247 cm−12943 cm−1,表明该包裹体中气体成分主要为CO2、N2和CH4,伴生盐水包裹体测温101℃

    Figure 8.  Fluid inclusions and their laser Raman spectral characteristics in first member of Shihezi Formation of Well Jin-30 in Xinzhao East Zone, Hangjinqi area

    图 9  杭锦旗新召东区带锦30井天然气充注历史

    P. 二叠纪;T. 三叠纪;J. 侏罗纪;K. 白垩纪;E. 古近纪;N-Q. 新近纪–第四纪;下同

    Figure 9.  Natural gas charging history of Well Jin-30 in Xinzhao East Zone, Hangjinqi area

    图 10  杭锦旗新召东区带孔隙度与排替压力(a)、中值压力(b)拟合关系图

    Figure 10.  Fitting relationship of porosity with displacement pressure (a) and median pressure (b) in Xinzhao East Zone, Hangjinqi area

    图 11  杭锦旗新召东区带盒一段不同致密类型储层天然气成藏动力−阻力定量评价图

    a. 储层致密化与天然气成藏时序关系;b. 成藏动力−排替压力耦合演化史;c. 成藏动力−中值压力耦合演化史

    Figure 11.  Quantitative evaluation of driving and resisting forces of natural gas accumulation of different tight reservoir types in first member of Shihezi Formation, Xinzhao East Zone, Hangjinqi area

    图 12  杭锦旗地区盒一段储层产能与净动力相关性散点图

    Figure 12.  Scatter plot of correlation between reservoir productivity and net driving force in first member of Shihezi Formation, Hangjinqi area

    表  1  杭锦旗地区新召东区带单井模拟模型选取方案

    Table  1.   Selection schemes of single-well simulation models in Xinzhao East Zone, Hangjinqi area

    系统
    模块
    功能 系统提供的模型 本研究方案
    地史 构造沉降史 构造沉降模型 Airy均衡模型 Airy均衡模型
    地层埋藏史 压实模型 指数模型 指数模型
    倒数模型
    固体率模型
    孔隙度表
    渗透率
    模型
    修正的K-C模型 Modified
    Kozeny-
    Carman
    幂函数模型Power Function
    孔隙度/渗透率关系
    热史 热流史
    地温史
    梯度热流模型 瞬变热流
    模型
    稳态热流模型
    瞬变热流模型
    裂谷热流模型
    生烃史 有机质
    成熟度史
    Lopatin-waples TTI法 LLNL-Easy
    Ro
    LLNL-Easy Ro
    简易Ro法
    生烃史 Ro-生烃率法 化学动
    力学法
    化学动力学法
      注:LLNL-Esay Ro法. 美国劳伦斯利弗莫尔国家实验室简易镜质体反射率法;Ro. 镜质体反射率;下同
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  杭锦旗新召东区带锦30井包裹体测温数据及气包裹体组成判识

    Table  2.   Microthermometric data of fluid inclusions and identification of gas inclusion composition in well Jin-30 in Xinzhao East Zone, Hangjinqi area

    宿主
    矿物
    分布
    特征
    包裹体
    类型
    气液
    比/%
    单偏
    颜色
    荧光
    颜色
    气包裹
    体成分
    伴生盐水包裹
    体均一温度/℃
    石英 颗粒内
    裂纹
    气烃 100 灰黑 CO2和CH4 150~160
    N2和CH4 120~135
    CO2、N2和CH4 100~110
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  杭锦旗新召东区带盒一段不同致密类型储层不同时期天然气成藏阻力估算

    Table  3.   Estimation of resisting force of natural gas accumulation in different periods of different tight reservoir types in first member of Shihezi Formation, Xinzhao East Zone, Hangjinqi area

    储层受控类型 时间/Ma 孔隙度/% 排替压力/MPa 中值压力/MPa
    压实主导
    致密型
    280 43.0 0.08 0.54
    260 35.4 0.11 0.78
    240 10.2 0.80 8.31
    150 9.5 0.89 9.51
    110 9.4 0.91 9.70
    0 9.3 0.92 9.90
    石英胶结主导
    致密型
    280 40.0 0.09 0.62
    260 34.1 0.12 0.84
    240 26.1 0.18 1.40
    150 9.4 0.91 9.70
    110 7.2 1.38 16.09
    0 6.0 1.84 22.73
    溶蚀主导
    未致密型
    280 43.2 0.08 0.54
    260 36.5 0.11 0.74
    240 31.7 0.13 0.97
    150 30.1 0.14 1.07
    110 16.5 0.37 3.34
    0 14.9 0.44 4.05
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 戴金星, 倪云燕, 吴小奇. 中国致密砂岩气及在勘探开发上的重要意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2012, 39(3): 257-264.

    DAI J X, NI Y Y, WU X Q. Tight gas in China and its significance in exploration and exploitation[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(3): 257-264. (in Chinese with English abstract
    [2] 贾承造, 邹才能, 李建忠, 等. 中国致密油评价标准、主要类型、基本特征及资源前景[J]. 石油学报, 2012, 33(3): 343-350.

    JIA C Z, ZOU C N, LI J Z, et al. Assessment criteria, main types, basic features and resource prospects of the tight oil in China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2012, 33(3): 343-350. (in Chinese with English abstract
    [3] 赵群, 杨慎, 钱伟, 等. 中国非常规天然气开发现状及前景思考[J]. 环境影响评价, 2020, 42(5): 34-37.

    ZHAO Q, YANG S, QIAN W, et al. Current situation and prospect of unconventional gas development in China[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment, 2020, 42(5): 34-37. (in Chinese with English abstract
    [4] 贾承造. 论非常规油气对经典石油天然气地质学理论的突破及意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2017, 44(1): 1-11. doi: 10.1016/S1876-3804(17)30002-2

    JIA C Z. Breakthrough and significance of unconventional oil and gas to classical petroleum geological theory[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2017, 44(1): 1-11. (in Chinese with English abstract doi: 10.1016/S1876-3804(17)30002-2
    [5] 宋岩, 贾承造, 姜林, 等. 全油气系统内涵与研究思路[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2024, 51(6): 1199-1210. doi: 10.11698/PED.20240223

    SONG Y, JIA C Z, JIANG L, et al. Connotation and research strategy of the whole petroleum system[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2024, 51(6): 1199-1210. (in Chinese with English abstract doi: 10.11698/PED.20240223
    [6] POLLASTRO R M. Total petroleum system assessment of undiscovered resources in the giant Barnett Shale continuous (unconventional) gas accumulation, Fort Worth Basin, Texas[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2007, 91(4): 551-578. doi: 10.1306/06200606007
    [7] CUMELLA S P , SHANLEY K W , CAMP W K . Basin-centered Gas or Subtle Conventional Traps?[J]. Understanding Exploring & Developing Tight Gas Sands, 2008, 10.1306/9780891819028 (Chapter 4): 49-61.
    [8] 赵靖舟, 曹青, 白玉彬, 等. 油气藏形成与分布: 从连续到不连续——兼论油气藏概念及分类[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(2): 145-159.

    ZHAO J Z, CAO Q, BAI Y B, et al. Petroleum accumulation from continuous to discontinuous: Concept, classification and distribution[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2016, 37(2): 145-159. (in Chinese with English abstract
    [9] 贾爱林, 位云生, 郭智, 等. 中国致密砂岩气开发现状与前景展望[J]. 天然气工业, 2022, 42(1): 83-92.

    JIA A L, WEI Y S, GUO Z, et al. Development status and prospect of tight sandstone gas in China[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2022, 42(1): 83-92. (in Chinese with English abstract
    [10] SCHMOKER J W, GAUTIER D L. Sandstone porosity as a function of thermal maturity[J]. Geology, 1988, 16(11): 1007. doi: 10.1130/0091-7613(1988)016<1007:spaafo>2.3.co;2
    [11] GAUTIER D L, DOLTON G, TAKAHASHI K, et al. 1995 National Assessment of United States oil and gas resources: Results, methodology, and supporting data (Release 2)[EB/OL]. U. S. Geological Survey Data Series 30, 1996. https://doi.org/10.3133/ds30.
    [12] 庞雄奇, 贾承造, 宋岩, 等. 全油气系统定量评价: 方法原理与实际应用[J]. 石油学报, 2022, 43(6): 727-759. doi: 10.7623/syxb202206001

    PANG X Q, JIA C Z, SONG Y, et al. Quantitative evaluation of whole petroleum system: Principle and application[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2022, 43(6): 727-759. (in Chinese with English abstract doi: 10.7623/syxb202206001
    [13] 付金华, 范立勇, 刘新社, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地天然气勘探新进展、前景展望和对策措施[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2019, 24(4): 418-430. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2019.04.002

    FU J H, FAN L Y, LIU X S, et al. New progresses, prospects and countermeasures of natural gas exploration in the Ordos Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2019, 24(4): 418-430. (in Chinese with English abstract doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2019.04.002
    [14] 郑民, 李建忠, 吴晓智, 等. 我国主要含油气盆地油气资源潜力及未来重点勘探领域[J]. 地球科学, 2019, 44(3): 833-847.

    ZHENG M, LI J Z, WU X Z, et al. Potential of oil and natural gas resources of main hydrocarbon-bearing basins and key exploration fields in China[J]. Earth Science, 2019, 44(3): 833-847. (in Chinese with English abstract
    [15] 胡素云, 李建忠, 王铜山, 等. 中国石油油气资源潜力分析与勘探选区思考[J]. 石油实验地质, 2020, 42(5): 813-823.

    HU S Y, LI J Z, WANG T S, et al. CNPC oil and gas resource potential and exploration target selection[J]. Petroleum Geology and Experiment, 2020, 42(5): 813-823. (in Chinese with English abstract
    [16] 陈敬轶, 贾会冲, 李永杰, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地伊盟隆起上古生界天然气成因及气源[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2016, 37(2): 205-209. doi: 10.11743/ogg20160208

    CHEN J Y, JIA H C, LI Y J, et al. Origin and source of natural gas in the Upper Paleozoic of the Yimeng Uplift, Ordos Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2016, 37(2): 205-209. (in Chinese with English abstract doi: 10.11743/ogg20160208
    [17] 张威, 何发岐, 闫相宾, 等. 大型辫状河席状复合河道岩性圈闭识别描述方法及应用[J]. 石油实验地质, 2021, 43(3): 432-442.

    ZHANG W, HE F Q, YAN X B, et al. Study and application of identification and description methods for lithologic traps in large braided river sheet composite channels[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2021, 43(3): 432-442. (in Chinese with English abstract
    [18] 何发岐, 王付斌, 张威, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地北缘勘探思路转变与天然气领域重大突破[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2020, 25(6): 39-49. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2020.06.004

    HE F Q, WANG F B, ZHANG W, et al. Transformation of exploration ideas and major breakthrough in natural gas discovery in the northern margin of the Ordos Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2020, 25(6): 39-49. (in Chinese with English abstract doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2020.06.004
    [19] 景海杰, 王琳霖, 任克雄, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地北部新召地区山西组砂岩储层压力演化与低压成因[J]. 地质科技通报, 2026, 45(1): 81-94. doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20240130

    JING H J, WANG L L, REN K X, et al. Pressure evolution and underpressure generation in the Shanxi Formation sandstone reservoirs of the Xinzhao area, northern Ordos Basin[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2026, 45(1): 81-94. (in Chinese with English abstract doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.tb20240130
    [20] 樊宇洁, 孟祥振, 蒲仁海, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长探区本溪组物源分析[J]. 地质科技通报, 2025, 44(3): 197-211.

    FAN Y J, MENG X Z, PU R H, et al. Provenance analysis of Benxi Formation in the Yanchang exploration area of the Ordos Basin[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2025, 44(3): 197-211. (in Chinese with English abstract
    [21] 张威, 何发岐, 闫相宾, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地北部构造叠置与天然气聚集研究[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2022, 51(4): 689-703. doi: 10.13247/j.cnki.jcumt.001356

    ZHANG W, HE F Q, YAN X B, et al. Tectonic superposition and accumulation of natural gas in northern Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2022, 51(4): 689-703. (in Chinese with English abstract doi: 10.13247/j.cnki.jcumt.001356
    [22] 李亚辉, 刘钰铭, 宋文强, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地杭锦旗地区盒1段致密气藏储层特征及分类评价[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2025, 36(4): 567-579. doi: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2024.11.008

    LI Y H, LIU Y M, SONG W Q, et al. Characteristics and classification evaluation of tight gas reservoirs of He1 Member in Hangjinqi area, Ordos Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2025, 36(4): 567-579. (in Chinese with English abstract doi: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2024.11.008
    [23] 李晓光, 倪智勇, 宋到福, 等. 杭锦旗地区二叠系储层油气成藏期次及流体势特征[J]. 吉林大学学报(地球科学版), 2024, 54(4): 1110-1123. doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20220236

    LI X G, NI Z Y, SONG D F, et al. Hydrocarbon accumulation stages and fluid potential characteristics of Permian Reservoirs in Hangjinqi area[J]. Journal of Jilin University (Earth Science Edition), 2024, 54(4): 1110-1123. (in Chinese with English abstract doi: 10.13278/j.cnki.jjuese.20220236
    [24] 吴小奇, 倪春华, 马亮帮, 等. 天然气运移轻烃地球化学示踪: 以鄂尔多斯盆地东胜气田为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2024, 51(2): 273-284.

    WU X Q, NI C H, MA L B, et al. Tracing of natural gas migration by light hydrocarbons: A case study of the Dongsheng gas field in the Ordos Basin, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2024, 51(2): 273-284. (in Chinese with English abstract
    [25] 张迈, 宋到福, 王铁冠, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地杭锦旗地区山西组−太原组烃源岩地球化学特征对比研究及意义[J]. 长江大学学报(自科版), 2023, 20(5): 55-66. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1409.2023.05.005

    ZHANG M, SONG D F, WANG T G, et al. Comparative study and its significance of geochemical characteristics of source rocks from Shanxi Formation and Taiyuan Formation in Hangjinqi area of Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Yangtze University (Natural Science Edition), 2023, 20(5): 55-66. (in Chinese with English abstract doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1409.2023.05.005
    [26] 徐思阳, 刘岩, 李可赛. 致密砂岩气藏地层水对含气性响应机理分析: 以鄂尔多斯盆地杭锦旗地区下石盒子组气藏为例[J]. 天然气勘探与开发, 2022, 45(2): 81-91. doi: 10.12055/gaskk.issn.1673-3177.2022.02.011

    XU S Y, LIU Y, LI K S. Mechanism of formation-water property responding to gas saturation in tight sandstone gas reservoirs: Examples from Lower Shihezi gas reservoirs, Hangjinqi area, Ordos Basin[J]. Natural Gas Exploration and Development, 2022, 45(2): 81-91. (in Chinese with English abstract doi: 10.12055/gaskk.issn.1673-3177.2022.02.011
    [27] 刘俞佐, 石万忠, 刘凯, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地杭锦旗东部地区上古生界天然气成藏模式[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2020, 32(3): 56-67.

    LIU Y Z, SHI W Z, LIU K, et al. Natural gas accumulation patterns of Upper Paleozoic in eastern Hangjinqi area, Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2020, 32(3): 56-67. (in Chinese with English abstract
    [28] 杨俊, 徐清海, 母彩霞, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地西南缘侏罗系延安组油页岩发育特征及其古环境恢复[J]. 地质科技通报, 2025, 44(3): 182-196.

    YANG J, XU Q H, MU C X, et al. Characteristics of oil shale development and paleoenvironment restoration of Jurassic Yan'an Formation in southwestern Ordos Basin[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2025, 44(3): 182-196. (in Chinese with English abstract
    [29] GAO J C, MA B B, LU Y C, et al. Origin of authigenic kaolinite with implications for Permian tight gas sandstone reservoirs in the northern Ordos Basin, Central China[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2022, 99: 104429.
    [30] XIA L, LIU Z, LI W L, et al. Ternary analytic porosity-reduction model of sandstone compaction trend and its significance in petroleum geology: A case study of tight sandstones in Permian Lower Shihezi Formation of Shilijiahan area, Ordos Basin, China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(2): 290-301.
    [31] FAN A P, YANG R C, LENHARDT N, et al. Cementation and porosity evolution of tight sandstone reservoirs in the Permian Sulige gas field, Ordos Basin (Central China)[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2019, 103: 276-293.
    [32] 冯小哲, 祝海华. 鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格地区下石盒子组致密砂岩储层微观孔隙结构及分形特征[J]. 地质科技情报, 2019, 38(3): 147-156.

    FENG X Z, ZHU H H. Micro-pore structure and fractal characteristics of the xiashihezi formation tight sandstone reservoirs in Sulige area, Ordos Basin[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2019, 38(3): 147-156. (in Chinese with English abstract
    [33] LIU D K, SUN W, REN D Z, et al. Quartz cement origins and impact on storage performance in Permian Upper Shihezi Formation tight sandstone reservoirs in the northern Ordos Basin, China[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2019, 178: 485-496.
    [34] 赵桂萍. 鄂尔多斯盆地杭锦旗地区上古生界烃源岩热演化特征模拟研究[J]. 石油实验地质, 2016, 38(5): 641-646.

    ZHAO G P. Thermal evolution modeling of Neopaleozoic source rocks in Hangjinqi region, Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2016, 38(5): 641-646. (in Chinese with English abstract
    [35] 赵永强, 许锦, 倪春华, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地杭锦旗地区上古生界原油成因及勘探前景[J]. 石油实验地质, 2022, 44(3): 487-496.

    ZHAO Y Q, XU J, NI C H, et al. Origin and exploration prospect of Upper Paleozoic crude oil from Hangjinqi area, Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2022, 44(3): 487-496. (in Chinese with English abstract
    [36] YU H W, YE J R, CAO Q, et al. Study on the tight gas accumulation process and model in the transition zone at the margin of the basin: A case study on the Permian Lower Shihezi Formation, Duguijiahan block, Ordos Basin, northern China[J]. Energies, 2023, 16(3): 1493.
    [37] 项鑫, 黄传炎, 曹兰柱, 等. 二连盆地洼槽区非常规油气富集模式及勘探潜力[J]. 地学前缘, 2023, 30(6): 462-472.

    XIANG X, HUANG C Y, CAO L Z, et al. Enrichment model and exploration potential for unconventional oiland gas in troughs, Erlian Basin[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2023, 30(6): 462-472. (in Chinese with English abstract
    [38] 周立宏, 陈长伟, 陈家旭, 等. 渤海湾盆地黄骅坳陷致密油气勘探新领域及资源潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2025, 46(1): 154-172.

    ZHOU L H, CHEN C W, CHEN J X, et al. New exploration fields and resource potential of tight oil and gas in Huanghua Depression of Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2025, 46(1): 154-172. (in Chinese with English abstract
    [39] 张随随, 范昌育, 王德英, 等. 页岩孔隙压力预测新方法: 以渤海湾盆地渤东凹陷为例[J]. 地质科技通报, 2024, 43(4): 27-38.

    ZHANG S S, FAN C Y, WANG D Y, et al. A new method for predicting shale pore pressure: A case study of the Bodong Depression in the Bohai Bay Basin[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2024, 43(4): 27-38. (in Chinese with English abstract
    [40] LIU Y M, YE J R, ZONG J, et al. Analysis of forces during tight oil charging and implications for the oiliness of the tight reservoir: A case study of the third member of the Palaeogene Shahejie Formation, Qibei slope, Qikou Sag[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 2022, 144: 105819.
  • 加载中
图(12) / 表(3)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  11
  • PDF下载量:  0
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 网络出版日期:  2026-04-27

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回

    温馨提示:近日,有不明身份人员冒充本刊编辑部或编委会给作者发送邮件,以论文质量核查等为由,要求作者添加微信。请作者提高警惕,认准编辑部官方邮箱、电话和QQ群,注意甄别虚假信息,谨防上当受骗。如有疑问,可及时联系编辑部核实。

     《地质科技通报》编辑部