投审稿入口
Characteristics and causes of physical property differences of deep and ultradeep tight sandstone reservoirs: A case study of the Bashijiqike Formation in the Bozi area of the Kuqa Depression
-
摘要:
库车坳陷博孜地区在
8000 m以深仍发育优质储层且高产工业气流，但其巴什基奇克组致密砂岩储层物性平面上存在着明显的差异。为明确此类储层发育的特征，降低深层−超深层油气勘探的风险，基于测录井、铸体薄片、高压压汞及PVT 相图等实验分析结果，探讨了致密砂岩储层特征及物性差异成因。研究结果表明：博孜地区巴什基奇克组储层岩石类型为中−细粒岩屑长石砂岩和长石岩屑砂岩，碳酸盐胶结物含量平面分布差异大；中−细粒砂岩储层原始孔隙度介于32.4%～38.1%，颗粒间压实强度相似，以点−线接触为主；南部储层平均孔隙度为8.6%，平均渗透率为3.4×10−3 µm2；中部储层平均孔隙度为6.53%，平均渗透率为0.65×10−3 µm2；北部储层平均孔隙度为4.9%，平均渗透率为0.62×10−3 µm2；南部储层储集空间以原生粒间孔为主，北部和中部储层以残余粒间孔和溶蚀孔隙为主；南部储层较北部和中部储层孔喉结构更好。博孜地区砂岩储层物性受沉积、成岩和构造作用（裂缝）共同控制，其中碳酸盐胶结是后期储层物性改造的主要因素。超压、烃类流体充注及裂缝发育影响了碳酸盐胶结，进而造成储层物性差异。超压较强，油气充注时间较早及裂缝充填较低导致博孜南部储层物性好于北部与中部。Abstract:Despite depths exceeding
8000 m, high-quality reservoirs still exist, leading to prolific industrial gas flow production in the Bozi area of the Kuqa Depression. However, notable differences exist in the physical properties of the tight sandstone reservoirs of the Bashijiqike Formation.ObjectiveThis study aimed to clarify the development characteristics of these reservoirs and reduce the risks associated with deep and ultradeep oil and gas exploration.
MethodsOn the basis of experimental analyses of well logs, thin-section petrography, high-pressure mercury injection, and
PVT phase diagrams, the characteristics of tight sandstone reservoirs and the causes of physical property differences were discussed.ResultsThe rock types of the Bashijiqike Formation reservoir in the Bozi area, as highlighted in this study, include medium- to fine-grained lithic feldspar sandstone and feldspar lithic sandstone. Notable differences exist in the spatial distributions of carbonate cement content. The original porosity of the medium-fine sandstone reservoirs ranges from 32.4% to 38.1%, indicating that the occurrence of comparable intergranular compaction strengths primarily depends on point-line contacts. The southern reservoirs maintain an average porosity of 8.6% and an average permeability of 3.4×10−3 μm2. The central reservoirs exhibit an average porosity of 6.53% and an average permeability of 0.65×10−3 μm2. The average porosity and permeability of the northern reservoirs are 4.9% and 0.62×10−3 μm2, respectively. Primary intergranular pores dominate the southern reservoirs, whereas residual intergranular pores and dissolution porosity prevail in the northern and central reservoirs. Additionally, superior pore-throat structures characterize the southern region compared with those in the northern and central regions.
ConclusionThe physical properties of the sandstone reservoirs in the Bozi area are controlled by sedimentation, diagenesis, and tectonic processes (including fractures), with carbonate cementation emerging as the principal influencing for late-stage changes in reservoir physical properties. Overpressure, hydrocarbon fluid charging, and fracture development significantly influence carbonate cementation, subsequently causing variations in reservoir physical properties. Greater overpressure, earlier oil and gas charging, and limited fracture filling result in better reservoir properties in southern Bozi than in the northern and central areas.
-
图 1 库车坳陷博孜地区构造位置与圈闭特征
Figure 1. Structural location and trap characteristics in the Bozi area of the Kuqa Depression
图 2 库车坳陷博孜地区地层综合柱状图
Figure 2. Comprehensive strata in the Bozi area of the Kuqa Depression
图 3 库车坳陷博孜地区巴什基奇克组储层岩矿成分
Ⅰ. 石英砂岩；Ⅱ. 长石石英砂岩；Ⅲ. 岩屑石英砂岩；Ⅳ. 长石砂岩；Ⅴ. 岩屑长石砂岩；Ⅵ. 长石岩屑砂岩；Ⅶ. 岩屑砂岩
Figure 3. Rock composition of the Bashijiqike Formation in the Bozi area of the Kuqa Depression
图 4 库车坳陷博孜地区巴什基奇克组储层碳酸盐胶结物含量等值线图
Figure 4. Contour map of the carbonate cement content of the Bashijiqike Formation in the Bozi area of the Kuqa Depression
图 5 库车坳陷博孜地区巴什基奇克组岩心实测储层物性特征
Figure 5. Reservoir physical properties by core testing of the Bashijiqike Formation in the Bozi area of the Kuqa Depression
图 6 库车坳陷博孜地区巴什基奇克组储层实测氦孔隙度平面分布图
Figure 6. Measured helium porosity plane distribution of the Bashijiqike Formation in Bozi area of the Kuqa Depression
图 7 库车坳陷博孜地区巴什基奇克组储集空间
a. BZ8井，
8079.75 m，蓝色铸体（单偏光），原生粒间孔较发育；b. BZ9井，7689.91 m，蓝色铸体（单偏光），原生粒间孔较发育；c. BZ901井，7817.28 m，蓝色铸体（单偏光），原生粒间孔较发育；d. BZ102井，6757.57 m，红色铸体（单偏光），残余粒间孔和粒间溶孔较为发育，可见白云石胶结物充填于孔隙；e. BZ101井，6918.18 m，红色铸体（单偏光），残余粒间孔和粒间溶孔较为发育，可见白云石胶结物呈晶粒状均匀分布于填隙中；f. BZ21井，6256.9 m，蓝色铸体（单偏光），残余粒间孔和粒内溶孔发育；g. BZ1203井，6566.56 m，蓝色铸体（单偏光），残余粒间孔发育，少量粒间溶孔，方解石胶结物被染成红色；h. BZ301井，5835.58 m，蓝色铸体（单偏光），可见少量残余粒间孔，方解石胶结物被染成红色；i. BZ22井，6276.85 m，可见数条有效构造裂缝呈断续状延伸较远，宽0.01～0.03 mm，孔隙被方解石胶结物全充填（红染）Figure 7. Reservoir spaces of the Bashijiqike Formation in the Bozi area of the Kuqa Depression
图 8 库车坳陷博孜地区巴什基奇克组实测氦孔隙度与碳酸盐胶结物含量的关系
Figure 8. Relationship between measured helium porosity and carbonate cement content of the Bashijiqike Formation in the Bozi area of the Kuqa Depression
图 9 库车坳陷博孜地区巴什基奇克组典型高压压汞曲线
Figure 9. Typical high-pressure mercury curves of the Bashijiqike Formation in the Bozi area of the Kuqa Depression
图 10 库车坳陷博孜地区巴什基奇克储层物性与岩性之间的关系
Figure 10. Relationships between the reservoir physical properties and lithology of the Bashijiqike Formation in the Bozi area of the Kuqa Depression
图 11 库车坳陷博孜地区巴什基奇克组矿物颗粒接触关系对比统计
Figure 11. Comparative statistics of the contact relationships of mineral particles of the Bashijiqike Formation in the Bozi area of the Kuqa Depression
图 12 库车坳陷博孜地区巴什基奇克组储层碳酸盐胶结物与压力系数的关系
Figure 12. Relationship between the carbonate cement and reservoir pressure coefficient content of the Bashijiqike Formation in the Bozi area of the Kuqa Depressionin
图 13 库车坳陷博孜地区BZ7井(a)和BZ22井(b)油气充注史及成岩演化序列
Figure 13. Hydrocarbon charging history and diagenetic evolution sequence of the Well BZ7 (a) and Well BZ22 (b) in the Bozi area of the Kuqa Depression
图 14 库车坳陷博孜地区巴什基奇克组流体PVT相图（a）、油气相态与气油比叠合平面分布图（b）
Figure 14. Fluid PVT phase diagram (a), superimposed plane distributions of the oil and gas phases and the crude gas-oil ratio (b) of the Bashijiqike Formation in the Bozi area of the Kuqa Depression
图 15 库车坳陷博孜地区巴什基奇克组储层裂缝特征
a. BZ301井，
5881.39 m，可见垂直半充填剪切缝；b. BZ15井，4653.45 m，可见斜交剪切缝，全充填方解石；c. BZ13井，7119.85 m，可见由方解石全充填的斜交剪切缝；d. BZ9井，7684.10 m，可见高角度未充填斜交缝；e. BZ22井，6328.92 m，蓝色铸体（单偏光），可见粗大构造溶蚀缝一条，宽0.1～0.4 mm，全充填方解石，延伸较远，颗粒间主要填隙碳酸盐胶结物（红染）；f. BZ13井，7005.57 m，蓝色铸体（单偏光），粒间方解石胶结致密，岩石孔隙不发育，断续分布的微裂缝被方解石胶结物全充填（红染）；g. BZ301井，5851.98 m，蓝色铸体（单偏光），垂直纹层分布一条白云石半充填的构造裂缝；h. BZ9井，7675.95 m，蓝色铸体（单偏光），可见未充填构造裂缝，缝宽0.01～0.02 mm；i. BZ104井，FMI成像测井，6767.50 ～6805.00 m，可见一系列不同倾角裂缝Figure 15. Characteristics of reservoir fractures of the Bashijiqike Formation in the Bozi area of the Kuqa depression
图 16 库车坳陷博孜地区巴什基奇克组储层碳酸盐胶结物含量与裂缝密度的关系
Figure 16. Relationship between carbonate cement content and fracture density of the Bashijiqike Formation in the Bozi area of the Kuqa Depression
图 17 库车坳陷博孜地区巴什基奇克组储层裂缝充填性统计图
Figure 17. Statistical map of reservoir fracture filling of the Bashijiqike Formation in the Bozi area of the Kuqa Depression
表 1 库车坳陷博孜地区碳酸盐胶结物含量
Table 1. Contents of carbonate cement in the Bozi area of the Kuqa Depression
地区 井位 深度/m 样品数/个 碳酸盐胶结物$\varphi_B $/% 最小值 最大值 平均值 博孜北部 BZ3 5971.15 ～5981.43 5 11.6 22.1 15.92 BZ301 5835.58 ～5856.31 40 2.0 30.5 10.23 BZ6 4481.98 ～4489.81 9 7.7 22.0 15.44 BZ15 4650.55 ～4659.27 9 3.9 33.2 14.86 BZ17 6056.20 ～6063.92 9 3.9 17.5 11.81 BZ18 6816.58 ～6820.27 4 7.2 14.8 10.63 BZ21 6245.76 ～6257.14 20 2.1 18.6 10.66 BZ22 6276.66 ～6327.06 10 4.9 32.1 13.27 BZ1203 6561.55 ～6570.57 18 2.5 42.6 11.43 博孜中部 BZ101 6916.26 ～6918.62 4 1.57 15.58 8.59 BZ102 6757.57 ～6865.19 34 0.86 15.95 7.68 BZ103 7216.16 ～7311.20 20 0.6 39.0 14.70 BZ104 6795.27 ～6846.26 13 3.6 13.0 8.69 BZ106 6792.75 ～6798.13 15 2.5 14.7 7.78 BZ24 7217.97 ～7230.36 42 0.5 18.6 7.13 BZ10 7318.75 ～7319.40 9 10.0 19.0 15.33 BZ11 7309.01 ～7464.21 5 0.5 30.0 14.20 BZ13 7117.46 ～7119.54 24 1.0 35.0 13.38 博孜南部 BZ7 7549.25 ～7745.57 13 0.5 15.5 6.38 BZ8 8077.05 ～8085.49 15 0.5 8.2 5.46 BZ9 7675.70 ～7798.11 67 1.0 29.3 5.79 BZ901 7812.47 ～7907.00 18 1.0 12.7 6.63 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 库车坳陷博孜地区巴什基奇克组高压压汞相关参数
Table 2. Related parameters of high-pressure mercury of the Bashijiqike Formation in the Bozi area of the Kuqa Depression
地区 井位 深度/m 样品数/
个排驱压力/MPa 最大孔喉半径/μm 平均孔喉半径/μm 最小值 最大值 平均值 最小值 最大值 平均值 最小值 最大值 平均值 博孜北部 BZ3 5971.15 ～5981.43 5 1.76 4.64 2.86 0.16 0.43 0.30 0.03 0.07 0.05 BZ6 4481.98 ～4489.81 7 0.22 0.77 0.48 0.97 3.39 1.91 0.09 0.71 0.27 BZ12 6906.78 ～7000.83 3 6.87 11.64 9.02 0.06 0.11 0.09 0.01 0.03 0.02 BZ15 4650.55 ～4659.27 20 0.62 7.60 2.80 0.10 1.22 0.49 0.02 0.20 0.09 BZ17 6056.20 ～6063.92 9 0.34 3.53 1.55 0.21 2.19 0.86 0.04 0.42 0.14 BZ18 6816.58 ～6820.27 7 0.57 2.67 1.23 0.28 1.31 0.76 0.07 0.29 0.15 BZ21 6245.76 ～6257.14 20 0.56 3.56 1.25 0.21 1.34 0.71 0.06 0.18 0.12 BZ22 6276.66 ～6327.06 18 0.64 1.12 0.90 0.67 1.17 0.86 0.10 0.18 0.13 BZ301 5835.58 ～5856.31 26 0.23 19.60 3.43 0.04 3.30 0.53 0.01 0.68 0.10 BZ1203 6561.55 ～6570.57 15 0.96 14.82 3.75 0.05 0.78 0.29 0.01 0.10 0.05 博孜中部 BZ13 7118.62 ～7119.54 3 9.45 18.44 13.52 0.04 0.08 0.06 0.01 0.02 0.02 BZ101 6917.46 ～6924.20 3 0.31 1.00 0.61 0.74 2.36 1.51 0.16 0.45 0.31 BZ102 6773.00 ～6885.00 2 0.50 1.50 1.00 0.49 1.47 0.98 0.14 0.43 0.28 博孜南部 BZ7 7549.25 ～7745.88 13 0.44 1.19 0.75 0.63 1.71 1.12 0.12 0.39 0.23 BZ9 7675.70 ～7798.11 35 0.09 2.60 0.55 0.29 8.79 2.17 0.07 1.74 0.42
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] PANG X Q,JIA C Z,ZHANG K,et al. The dead line for oil and gas and implication for fossil resource prediction[J]. Earth System Science Data,2020,12(1):577-590. doi: 10.5194/essd-12-577-2020 [2] 操应长,远光辉,杨海军,等. 含油气盆地深层−超深层碎屑岩油气勘探现状与优质储层成因研究进展[J]. 石油学报,2022,43(1):112-140.CAO Y C,YUAN G H,YANG H J,et al. Current situation of oil and gas exploration and research progress of the origin of high-quality reservoirs in deep-ultra-deep clastic reservoirs of petroliferous basins[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2022,43(1):112-140. (in Chinese with English abstract [3] 刘宏坤,艾勇,王贵文,等. 深层、超深层致密砂岩储层成岩相测井定量评价:以库车坳陷博孜−大北地区为例[J]. 地质科技通报,2023,42(1):299-310.LIU H K,AI Y,WANG G W,et al. Quantitative well logging evaluation of diagenetic facies of deep and ultra deep tight sandstone reservoirs:A case study of Bozi-Dabei area in Kuqa Depression[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology,2023,42(1):299-310. (in Chinese with English abstract [4] 孙龙德,邹才能,朱如凯,等. 中国深层油气形成、分布与潜力分析[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2013,40(6):641-649.SUN L D,ZOU C N,ZHU R K,et al. Formation,distribution and potential of deep hydrocarbon resources in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2013,40(6):641-649. (in Chinese with English abstract [5] 田军,杨海军,吴超,等. 博孜9井的发现与塔里木盆地超深层天然气勘探潜力[J]. 天然气工业,2020,40(1):11-19.TIAN J,YANG H J,WU C,et al. Discovery of Well Bozi 9 and ultra-deep natural gas exploration potential in the Kelasu tectonic zone of the Tarim Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2020,40(1):11-19. (in Chinese with English abstract [6] 杨学文,王清华,李勇,等. 库车前陆冲断带博孜−大北万亿方大气区的形成机制[J]. 地学前缘,2022,29(6):175-187.YANG X W,WANG Q H,LI Y,et al. Formation mechanism of the Bozi-Dabei trillion cubic natural gas field,Kuqa foreland thrust belt[J]. Earth Science Frontiers,2022,29(6):175-187. (in Chinese with English abstract [7] 曾庆鲁,莫涛,赵继龙,等. 7 000 m以深优质砂岩储层的特征、成因机制及油气勘探意义:以库车坳陷下白垩统巴什基奇克组为例[J]. 天然气工业,2020,40(1):38-47.ZENG Q L,MO T,ZHAO J L,et al. Characteristics,genetic mechanism and oil & gas exploration significance of high-quality sandstone reservoirs deeper than 7 000 m:A case study of the Bashijiqike Formation of Lower Cretaceous in the Kuqa Depression[J]. Natural Gas Industry,2020,40(1):38-47. (in Chinese with English abstract [8] 王珂,张荣虎,曾庆鲁,等. 库车坳陷博孜−大北地区下白垩统深层−超深层储层特征及成因机制[J]. 中国矿业大学学报,2022,51(2):311-328.WANG K,ZHANG R H,ZENG Q L,et al. Characteristics and formation mechanism of Lower Cretaceous deep and ultra-deep reservoir in Bozi-Dabei area,Kuqa Depression[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology,2022,51(2):311-328. (in Chinese with English abstract [9] LAI J,LI D,WANG G W,et al. Can carbonate cementation be inhibited in continental red bed sandstone?[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering,2019,179:1123-1135. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2019.05.015 [10] WANG B,QIU N S,AMBERG S,et al. Modelling of pore pressure evolution in a compressional tectonic setting:The Kuqa Depression,Tarim Basin,northwestern China[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology,2022,146:105936. doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2022.105936 [11] 徐珂,张辉,鞠玮,等. 库车坳陷博孜X区块超深储层有效裂缝分布规律及对天然气产能的影响[J]. 地球科学,2023,48(7):2489-2505.XU K,ZHANG H,JU W,et al. Effective fracture distribution and its influence on natural gas productivity of ultra-deep reservoir in Bozi-X Block of Kuqa Depression[J]. Earth Science,2023,48(7):2489-2505. (in Chinese with English abstract [12] 张冠杰,张滨鑫,徐珂,等. 塔里木盆地库车坳陷博孜区块超深层致密砂岩储层裂缝特征及其对油气产能的影响[J]. 地质科技通报,2024,43(2):75-86.ZHANG G J,ZHANG B X,XU K,et al. Fracture characteristics of ultra-deep tight sandstone reservoirs in the Bozi Block,Kuqa Depression of Tarim Basin,and effects on oil-gas production[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology,2024,43(2):75-86. (in Chinese with English abstract [13] 杨海军,李勇,唐雁刚,等. 塔里木盆地克深气田成藏条件及勘探开发关键技术[J]. 石油学报,2021,42(3):399-414.YANG H J,LI Y,TANG Y G,et al. Accumulation conditions,key exploration and development technologies for Keshen gas field in Tarim Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2021,42(3):399-414. (in Chinese with English abstract [14] 王招明,李勇,谢会文,等. 库车前陆盆地超深层大油气田形成的地质认识[J]. 中国石油勘探,2016,21(1):37-43. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2016.01.004WANG Z M,LI Y,XIE H W,et al. Geological understanding on the formation of large-scale ultra-deep oil-gas field in Kuqa Foreland Basin[J]. China Petroleum Exploration,2016,21(1):37-43. (in Chinese with English abstract doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2016.01.004 [15] YANG K J,XU L W,QI J F,et al. Structural deformation of the northern Monocline Belt in the Kuqa Depression and implications for the Cenozoic uplift history of the South Tianshan Mountains[J]. Tectonophysics,2023,857:229840. doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2023.229840 [16] 戴金星,倪云燕,吴小奇. 中国致密砂岩气及在勘探开发上的重要意义[J]. 石油勘探与开发,2012,39(3):257-264.DAI J X,NI Y Y,WU X Q. Tight gas in China and its significance in exploration and exploitation[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development,2012,39(3):257-264. (in Chinese with English abstract [17] LIU K,WANG R,SHI W Z,et al. Diagenetic controls on reservoir quality and heterogeneity of the Triassic Chang 8 tight sandstones in the Binchang area (Ordos Basin,China)[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology,2022,146:105974. doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2022.105974 [18] 杨博伟,石万忠,张晓明,等. 黔南地区下石炭统打屋坝组页岩气储层孔隙结构特征及含气性评价[J]. 岩性油气藏,2024,36(1):45-58.YANG B W,SHI W Z,ZHANG X M,et al. Pore structure characteristics and gas-bearing properties of shale gas reservoirs of Lower Carboniferous Dawuba Formation in southern Guizhou[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs,2024,36(1):45-58. (in Chinese with English abstract [19] 李松,马立元,王濡岳,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地石盒子组−山西组致密储层形成主控因素与发育模式:以彬长地区为例[J]. 地质科技通报,2024,43(2):28-40.LI S,MA L Y,WANG R Y,et al. Main controlling factors and development model of tight reservoirs in the Shihezi Formation-Shanxi Formation in the Ordos Basin:Taking the Binchang area as an example[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology,2024,43(2):28-40. (in Chinese with English abstract [20] 赖锦,肖露,赵鑫,等. 深层−超深层优质碎屑岩储层成因与测井评价方法:以库车坳陷白垩系巴什基奇克组为例[J]. 石油学报,2023,44(4):612-625.LAI J,XIAO L,ZHAO X,et al. Genesis and logging evaluation of deep to ultra-deep high-quality clastic reservoirs:A case study of the Cretaceous Bashijiqike Formation in Kuqa Depression[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2023,44(4):612-625. (in Chinese with English abstract [21] 史超群,张慧芳,周思宇,等. 塔里木盆地库车坳陷克拉苏构造带−秋里塔格构造带白垩系巴什基奇克组深层、高产储层特征及控制因素[J]. 天然气地球科学,2020,31(8):1126-1138.SHI C Q,ZHANG H F,ZHOU S Y,et al. Comparative study on deep and high yielding reservoir characteristics and controlling factors of Cretaceous Bashijiqike Formation in Kelasu Structural Belt and Qiulitage Structural Belt of Kuqa Depression,Tarim Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience,2020,31(8):1126-1138. (in Chinese with English abstract [22] LAI J,LI D,BAI T Y,et al. Reservoir quality evaluation and prediction in ultra-deep tight sandstones in the Kuqa Depression,China[J]. Journal of Structural Geology,2023,170:104850. doi: 10.1016/j.jsg.2023.104850 [23] BEARDD C,WEYL P K. Influence of texture on porosity and permeability of unconsolidated sand[J]. AAPG Bulletin,1973,57(2):349-369. [24] 王冰,邱楠生,王祥,等. 库车坳陷克拉苏−依奇克里克构造带构造挤压型超压识别与计算[J]. 石油学报,2022,43(8):1107-1121.WANG B,QIU N S,WANG X,et al. Identification and calculation of tectonic compression overpressure of Kelasu-Yiqikelike Tectonic Belt in Kuqa Depression[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2022,43(8):1107-1121. (in Chinese with English abstract [25] QIN S,WANG R,SHI W Z,et al. Integrated controls of tectonics,diagenesis and sedimentation on sandstone densification in the Cretaceous paleo-uplift settings,north Tarim Basin[J]. Geoenergy Science and Engineering,2024,233:212561. doi: 10.1016/j.geoen.2023.212561 [26] PURVIS K,DENNIS P,HOLT L,et al. The origin of carbonate cements in the Hildasay reservoir,Cambo Field,Faroe-Shetland Basin:Clumped isotopic analysis and implications for reservoir performance[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology,2020,122:104641. doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2020.104641 [27] LUO C F,CHEN X J,SHI Z Q,et al. Effects of precipitation and dissolution of carbonate cements on the quality of deeply buried high-temperature and overpressured clastic reservoirs:XD 10 Block,Yinggehai Basin,South China Sea[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology,2022,139:105591. doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2022.105591 [28] 纪友亮,高崇龙,刘玉瑞,等. 高邮凹陷阜一段油气充注对储层物性演化的影响[J]. 同济大学学报(自然科学版),2015,43(1):133-139.JI Y L,GAO C L,LIU Y R,et al. Influence of hydrocarbon charging to the reservoir property in 1st Member of Funning Formation in Gaoyou Depression[J]. Journal of Tongji University (Natural Science),2015,43(1):133-139. (in Chinese with English abstract [29] DU H,SHI W Z,WANG R,et al. Dynamic evolution of gas hydrate systems affected by magmatism and Quaternary mass-transport deposits in the Qiongdongnan Basin,South China Sea,and implications for the global carbon cycle[J]. Marine Geology,2024,468:107209. doi: 10.1016/j.margeo.2023.107209 [30] AJDUKIEWICZ J M,NICHOLSON P H,ESCH W L. Prediction of deep reservoir quality using early diagenetic process models in the Jurassic Norphlet Formation,Gulf of Mexico[J]. AAPG Bulletin,2010,94(8):1189-1227. doi: 10.1306/04211009152 [31] DUAN W,LI C F,LUO C F,et al. Effect of formation overpressure on the reservoir diagenesis and its petroleum geological significance for the DF11 Block of the Yinggehai Basin,the South China Sea[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology,2018,97:49-65. doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2018.06.033 [32] 石万忠,陈红汉,何生. 库车坳陷构造挤压增压的定量评价及超压成因分析[J]. 石油学报,2007,28(6):59-65.SHI W Z,CHEN H H,HE S. Quantitative evaluation on contribution of structural compression to overpressure and analysis on origin of overpressure in Kuqa Depression[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2007,28(6):59-65. (in Chinese with English abstract [33] BLOCH S,LANDER R H,BONNELL L. Anomalously high porosity and permeability in deeply buried sandstone reservoirs:Origin and predictability[J]. AAPG Bulletin,2002,86(2):301-328. [34] AASE N E,WALDERHAUG O. The effect of hydrocarbons on quartz cementation:Diagenesis in the Upper Jurassic sandstones of the Miller Field,North Sea,revisited[J]. Petroleum Geoscience,2005,11(3):215-223. doi: 10.1144/1354-079304-648 [35] ZHAO S F,CHEN W,ZHOU L,et al. Characteristics of fluid inclusions and implications for the timing of hydrocarbon accumulation in the Cretaceous reservoirs,Kelasu Thrust Belt,Tarim Basin,China[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology,2019,99:473-487. doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2018.10.041 [36] 徐国盛,崔恒远,刘勇,等. 东海盆地西湖凹陷古近系花港组砂岩储层致密化与油气充注关系[J]. 地质科技通报,2020,39(3):20-29.XU G S,CUI H Y,LIU Y,et al. Relationship between sandstone reservoirs densification and hydrocarbon charging in the Paleogene Huagang Formation of Xihu Depression,East China Sea Basin[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology,2020,39(3):20-29. (in Chinese with English abstract [37] 叶慧,石万忠,王任,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部玉都走滑断裂带构造特征及其对油气成藏的控制[J]. 地球科学,2023,48(6):2294-2309.YE H,SHI W Z,WANG R,et al. Structural characteristics of Yudu Strike-slip Fault Zone and their control on hydrocarbon accumulation in southern Ordos Basin[J]. Earth Science,2023,48(6):2294-2309. (in Chinese with English abstract [38] 袁静,杨学君,袁凌荣,等. 库车坳陷DB气田白垩系砂岩胶结作用及其与构造裂缝关系[J]. 沉积学报,2015,33(4):754-763.YUAN J,YANG X J,YUAN L R,et al. Cementation and its relationship with tectonic fractures of Cretaceous sandstones in DB gas field of Kuqa Sub-basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica,2015,33(4):754-763. (in Chinese with English abstract [39] 李斌,姜潇俊,赵星星,等. 塔里木盆地台盆过渡带多相态油气藏成因及差异富集模式:以玉科地区奥陶系为例[J]. 石油学报,2023,44(5):794-808.LI B,JIANG X J,ZHAO X X,et al. Genesis and differential enrichment model of multiphase reservoirs in platform-basin transitional zone of Tarim Basin:A case study of the Ordovician in Yuke area[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica,2023,44(5):794-808. (in Chinese with English abstract [40] ZHANG Z Y,ZHU G Y,ZHANG Y J,et al. The origin and accumulation of multi-phase reservoirs in the east Tabei Uplift,Tarim Basin,China[J]. Marine and Petroleum Geology,2018,98:533-553. doi: 10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2018.08.036 [41] 王俊鹏,张惠良,张荣虎,等. 裂缝发育对超深层致密砂岩储层的改造作用:以塔里木盆地库车坳陷克深气田为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质,2018,39(1):77-88. doi: 10.11743/ogg20180108WANG J P,ZHANG H L,ZHANG R H,et al. Enhancement of ultra-deep tight sandstone reservoir quality by fractures:A case study of Keshen gas field in Kuqa Depression,Tarim Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology,2018,39(1):77-88. (in Chinese with English abstract doi: 10.11743/ogg20180108 [42] 王志民,王翠丽,徐珂,等. 超深层致密砂岩构造裂缝发育特征及控制因素:以塔里木盆地库车坳陷博孜−大北地区下白垩统储集层为例[J]. 天然气地球科学,2023,34(9):1535-1551.WANG Z M,WANG C L,XU K,et al. Characteristics and controlling factors of tectonic fractures of ultra-deep tight sandstone:Case study of the Lower Cretaceous reservoir in Bozi-Dabei area,Kuqa Depression,Tarim Basin[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience,2023,34(9):1535-1551. (in Chinese with English abstract -
下载:
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 1181
- PDF下载量: 101
- 被引次数: 0
