基于微观孔隙结构的低渗透砂岩储层分类评价

汪新光; 张冲; 张辉; 杨朝强; 彭小东; 赵楠; 王磊

doi:10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2021.0429

基于微观孔隙结构的低渗透砂岩储层分类评价

doi: 10.19509/j.cnki.dzkq.2021.0429

基金项目:

“十三五”国家科技重大专项南海西部海域低渗油藏勘探开发关键技术研究 2016ZX05024-006

中海油重大科技攻关南海西部油田上产2000万方关键技术研究 CNOOC-KJ135ZDXM38ZJ

详细信息

作者简介:
汪新光(1981-), 男, 高级工程师, 主要从事油气田开发地质研究工作。E-mail: wangxg3@cnooc.com.cn

中图分类号: P618.13
计量
- 文章访问数: 1591
- PDF下载量: 612
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2020-11-30

Classification and evaluation of low-permeability sand reservoir based on micro-pore structure

摘要

摘要: 针对已有的低渗透储层分类评价方法难以满足北部湾盆地流沙港组低渗透油藏精细评价与油藏开发需求的问题，通过恒速压汞、高压压汞、核磁共振等实验手段开展低渗透储层微观孔隙结构与渗流特征分析，优选储层品质指数、孔隙结构分形维数、主流喉道半径、平均孔喉道半径、可动流体百分数、启动压力梯度变化率共6个参数，基于灰色关联权重分析法建立北部湾盆地低渗透储层综合分类评价标准，进而开展低渗透储量分类评价，为北部湾低渗透储量开发潜力和攻关方向提供依据，分析结果表明：Ⅰ类与Ⅱa类为相对优质的低渗透储量，目前已投入规模开发；Ⅱb类与Ⅲ类为较难动用储量，需采取合理的开发策略与开发模式进行试验性开发；Ⅳ类储量在现有条件下难以有效开发。
- 北部湾盆地 /
- 低渗透储层 /
- 微观孔隙结构 /
- 渗流能力评价因子 /
- 储层分类评价
Abstract: The undeveloped low-permeability oil reserves of the Liushagang Formation in the Beibu Gulf Basin are large, but the reservoir quality is poor. The existing classification standards for low-permeability reservoirs cannot meet the needs of fine reservoir evaluation and offshore development.Based on the experiments of constant rate mercury injection, high pressure mercury injection, NMR and seepage mechanism, this paper comprehensively analyzed the micro-pore structure and seepage characteristics, and optimized six kinds of reservoir evaluation parameters: reservoir quality index, fractal dimension of pore structure, mainstream throat radius, mean throat radius, percentage of movable fluid and change rate of threshold pressure gradient, meanwhile, the classification limit of various characterization parameters were determined by integrating with the reservoir quality index, reservoir seepage ability evaluation factors and specific productivity index constraint parameters. A comprehensive evaluation criterion for low-permeability oil reservoirs is established based on the Grey Relational Analysis method, which is divided into Ⅰ, Ⅱa, Ⅱb, Ⅲ and Ⅳ from good to bad.Carried out the grading evaluation of low-permeability reserves and the research results provide a theoretical basis for the analysis of the development potential, the research direction of the low-permeability reserves in Beibu Gulf Basin.The results show: types Ⅰand Ⅱa are relatively high-quality low-permeability reserves and have been put into large-scale development.Types Ⅱb and Ⅲ are extra-low-permeability reserves and are difficult to develop, which need to be formulated for experimental development by reasonable technical measures and development models.
- Beibu Gulf Basin /
- low-permeability reservoir /
- micro-pore structure /
- evaluation factor of seepage capacity /
- reservoir classification and evaluation

HTML全文

图 1 北部湾盆地流三段砂岩类型三角图

Figure 1. The triangular chart of the sandstones classification in Beibu Gulf Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 北部湾盆地低渗储层储集空间类型

a.WA-1井，2 650.5 m, 碎屑颗粒以极粗粒占绝对优势，少部分粗粒和砾石；溶蚀强烈，孔隙发育极好，连通性好；b.WA-2井，2 779.8 m，长石基本被溶蚀，形成大量的铸模孔，并生成高岭石等黏土矿物，孔隙发育较好；c.WA-2井，2 774.64 m，长石溶蚀较强烈，部分形成铸模孔、粒内溶孔。整体孔隙较好，连通性一般；d.WA-3井，2 816 m，岩屑粒内溶孔；e.WA-3井，2 867 m，不完全溶蚀，泥质重，部分变质岩受压实作用影响呈假杂基状，孔隙发育较差，连通性差；f.WA-14井，2 900 m，较致密，长石风化较深形成少量黏土化颗粒，部分长石溶蚀形成铸模孔，连通性差；g.WA-7井，2 951 m，颗粒凹凸接触，孔隙不发育，岩石因强烈的压实作用而变得致密；h.WA-8井，2 760 m，铁方解石充填交代，泥质重，孔隙不发育；i.WA-9，井2 614 m，铁方解石胶结，整体孔隙较差，连通性差

Figure 2. Reservoir space types of low-permeability reservoir in Beibu Gulf Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 不同渗透率岩样喉道半径分布曲线(a)和主流喉道半径与渗透率关系(b)

Figure 3. Distribution curve of throat radius of different low-permeability cores (a), and relationship between the main flow throat radius and permeability (b)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 不同渗透率岩样孔喉道半径分布曲线(a)和不同渗透率岩样孔喉半径对渗透率的贡献(b)

Figure 4. Distribution curve of pore throat radius of different low-permeability cores (a), and relationship between permeability and pore throat radius for low-permeability (b)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 孔隙结构分形特征与渗透率贡献曲线(a)、孔隙结构分形维数与储层品质指数关系(b)

Figure 5. The fractal characteristics of pore structure and curve of permeability contribution (a), and relationship between the fractal dimension of pore structure and reservoir quality index (b)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 可动流体百分数与渗透率关系

Figure 6. Relationship between the percentage of movable fluid and permeability

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 启动压力梯度与渗透率的关系

Figure 7. Relationship between permeability and threshold pressure gradient

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 8 北部湾盆地低渗透油藏比采油指数与储层品质指数关系

Figure 8. Relationship between specific productivity index and reservoir quality index of low-permeability reservoirs in Beibu Gulf Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 9 储层渗流能力评价因子与储层品质指数关系

Figure 9. Relationship between reservoir flow ability evaluation factor and reservoir quality index

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 10 不同类型储层的孔隙结构发育特征

Figure 10. Characteristics of pore structure development in different types of reservoirs

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 11 北部湾盆地X油田低渗储层综合评价因子与单井初期产油量关系

Figure 11. Relationship between low-permeability reservoir comprehensive evaluation index andinitial oil production of single well in X Oilfield of Beibu Gulf Basin

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 北部湾低渗透储层分类评价标准

Table 1. Classification and evaluation standards of low-permeability reservoirs in Beibu Gulf Basin

储层类型		渗透率/10^-3μm²	储层品质指数RQI	孔隙结构分形维 N1	储层可动流体品质指数 RQI*S_D/%	主流喉道半径 R_h/μm	平均孔喉道半径 R_kh/μm	可动流体饱和度 S_D/%	启动压力梯度变化率 dP/10^-3	储层渗流能力评价因子I_p/(10^-3μm²·cp^-1)	比采油指数/(m³·d^-1·MPa^-1·m^-1)
Ⅰ		50~20	>1.1	< 2.15	>60	4~6	>2	>70	>1.12	30~100	>1
Ⅱ	Ⅱa Ⅱb	20~10 10~5	0.9~1.1 0.6 ~0.9	2.15~2.23	50~60 20~50	3~4 2~3	>2	65~70 55~65	-3.00~1.12 -19.38~3.00	20~30 3~20	0.5~1 0.2 ~0.5
Ⅲ		5~1	0.3~0.6	2.23~2.29	4~20	1~2	1~2	25~55	-114.00~-19.38	0.3~3	0.02~0.2
Ⅳ		< 1	< 0.3	>2.29	< 4	< 1	< 1	< 25	< -114	< 0.3	< 0.02

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 低渗透储层分类评价参数的权重值

Table 2. Weights of classification parameters for low-permeability reservoirs

评价参数	储层渗流能力评价因子(I_p)	主流喉道半径 (R_h)	启动压力梯度变化率 (dP)	储层可动流体品质指数(SR)	孔隙结构分形维数(N1)
权重系数	0.272	0.170	0.209	0.210	0.139

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(32)

[1]	胡永乐, 宋新民, 杨思玉. 低渗透油气田开采技术[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2002. Hu Y L, Song X M, Yang S Y, et al. Exploitation technology of low permeability oil and gas fields[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2002(in Chinese).
[2]	翟光明, 高维亮. 中国石油地质学[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2005. Zhai G M, Gao W L. Petroleum geology of China[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2005(in Chinese).
[3]	杨正明, 张英芝, 郝明强, 等. 低渗透油田储层综合评价方法[J]. 石油学报, 2006, 27(2): 65-66. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB200602013.htm Yang Z M, Zhang Y Z, Hao M Q, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of reservoir in low permeability oilfields[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2006, 27(2): 65-66(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB200602013.htm
[4]	赵靖舟, 吴少波, 武富礼. 论低渗透储层的分类与评价标准: 以鄂尔多斯盆地为例[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2007, 19(3): 28-31. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2007.03.005 Zhao J Z, Wu S B, Wu F L. The classification and evaluation criterion of low permeability reservoir: An example from Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2007, 19(3): 28-31(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2007.03.005
[5]	张金庆, 杨凯雷, 梁斌. 我国海上低渗油田分类标准研究[J]. 中国海上油气, 2012, 24(6): 25-27. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHSD201206005.htm Zhang J Q, Yang K L, Liang B. A classification of low permeability oilfields offshore China[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2012, 24(6): 25-27(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHSD201206005.htm
[6]	张仲宏, 杨正明, 刘先贵, 等. 低渗透油藏储层分级评价方法及应用[J]. 石油学报, 2012, 33(3): 437-441. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201203013.htm Zhang Z H, Yang Z M, Liu X G, et al. A grading evaluation method for low permeability reservoirs and its application[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2012, 33(3): 437-441(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201203013.htm
[7]	Clarkson C R, Jensen J L, Pedersen P K, et al. Innovative methods for flow-unit and pore-structure analyses in a tightsiltstone and shale gas reservoir[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2012, 96(2): 355-374. doi: 10.1306/05181110171
[8]	Anovitz L M, Cole D R. Characterization and analysis of porosity and pore structures[J]. Rev. Mineral. Geochem., 2015, 80: 61-164. doi: 10.2138/rmg.2015.80.04
[9]	张帆, 萧汉敏, 姜振学, 等. 大庆油田扶余油层储层特征及经济甜点分类方案[J]. 地质科技通报, 2020, 39(6): 52-63. . https://dzkjqb.cug.edu.cn/CN/abstract/abstract10071.shtml Zhang F, Xiao H M, Jiang Z X, et al. Reservoir characteristics and economic sweet classification scheme of Fuyu reservoir in Daqing Oilfield[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2020, 39(6): 52-63(in Chinese with English abstract). https://dzkjqb.cug.edu.cn/CN/abstract/abstract10071.shtml
[10]	张铜耀, 郝鹏. 渤中凹陷深层特低孔特低渗砂砾岩储层储集空间精细表征[J]. 地质科技通报, 2020, 39(4): 117-124. https://dzkjqb.cug.edu.cn/CN/abstract/abstract10007.shtml Zhang T Y, Hao P. Fine characterization of the reservoir space in deep ultra-low porosity and ultra-low permeability glutenite in Bozhong Sag[J]. Bulletin of Geological Science and Technology, 2020, 39(4): 117-124(in Chinese with English abstract). https://dzkjqb.cug.edu.cn/CN/abstract/abstract10007.shtml
[11]	马旭鹏. 储层物性参数与其微观孔隙结构的内在联系[J]. 勘探地球物理进展, 2010, 33(3): 216-219. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ201003013.htm Ma X P. Internal relationship between physical property and micro-pore structure of reservoir[J]. Progress in Exploration Geophysics, 2010, 33(3): 216-219(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ201003013.htm
[12]	孟子圆, 孙卫, 刘登科, 等. 联合压汞法的致密储层微观孔隙结构及孔径分布特征: 以鄂尔多斯盆地吴起地区长6储层为例[J]. 地质科技情报, 2019, 38(2): 208-216. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201902024.htm Meng Z Y, Sun W, Liu D K, et al. Combined mercury porosimetry to characterize the microscopic pore structure and pore size distribution of tight reservoirs: A case of Chang 6 reservoir in Wuqi area, Ordos Basin[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2019, 38(2): 208-216(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201902024.htm
[13]	Mandelbrot B B. The fractal geometry of nature[M]. San Francisco: Freeman, 1982.
[14]	Krohn C E. Sandstone fractal and euclidean pore volume distributions[J]. Geophys. Res., 1988, 93(B4): 3286-3296. doi: 10.1029/JB093iB04p03286
[15]	Angulo R F, Alvarado V, Gonzalez H. Fractal dimensions from mercury intrusion capillary tests[R]. SPE 23695, 1992.
[16]	贺伟, 钟孚勋, 贺承祖, 等. 储层岩石孔隙的分形结构研究和应用[J]. 天然气工业, 2000, 20(2): 67-70. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0976.2000.02.019 He W, Zhong F X, He C Z, et al. Fractal texture research on the pores in reservoir rocks and its application[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2000, 20(2): 67-70(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0976.2000.02.019
[17]	Yu B M, Li J H. Some fractal characters of porous media[J]. Fractals, 2001, 9(3): 365-372. doi: 10.1142/S0218348X01000804
[18]	李留仁, 赵艳艳, 李忠兴, 等. 多孔介质微观孔隙结构分形特征及分形系数的意义[J]. 石油大学学报: 自然科学版, 2004, 28(3): 105-114. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYDX200403028.htm Li L R, Zhao Y Y, Li Z X, et al. Fractal characteristic of micropore structure of porouys media and the meaning of fractal coefficient[J]. Journal of the University of Petroleum: Natural Science Edition, 2004, 28(3): 105-114(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYDX200403028.htm
[19]	马新仿, 张士诚, 郎兆新. 孔隙结构特征参数的分形表征[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2005, 12(6): 34-36. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-9603.2005.06.011 Ma X F, Zhang S C, Lang Z X. Fractal characterization of characteristic parameters of pore structure[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2005, 12(6): 34-36(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-9603.2005.06.011
[20]	徐守余, 王淑萍. 砂岩储层微观结构分形特征研究: 以胜坨油田古近系沙河街组储层为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2013, 24(5): 886-893. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201305003.htm Xu S Y, Wang S P. Fractal feature about the micro-structure in sandstone reservoir: Taking the Paleogene Shahejie Formation in Shengtuo Oilfield as an example[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2013, 24(5): 886-893(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TDKX201305003.htm
[21]	张宪国, 张涛, 林承焰. 基于孔隙分形特征的低渗透储层孔隙结构评价[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2013, 25(6): 40-45. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2013.06.008 Zhang X G, Zhang T, Lin C Y. Pore structure evaluation of low permeability reservoir based on pore fractal features[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2013, 25(6): 40-45(in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2013.06.008
[22]	冯小哲, 祝海华. 鄂尔多斯盆地苏里格地区下石盒子组致密砂岩储层微观孔隙结构及分形特征[J]. 地质科技情报, 2019, 38(3): 147-156. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201903015.htm Feng X Z, Zhu H H. Micro-pore structure and fractal characteristics of the Xiashihezi Formation tight sandstone reservoirs in Sulige area, Ordos Basin[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2019, 38(3): 147-156(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201903015.htm
[23]	杨正明, 苗盛, 刘先贵, 等. 特低渗透油藏可动流体百分数参数及其应用[J]. 西安石油大学学报: 自然科学版, 2007, 22(2): 96-99. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XASY200702024.htm Yang Z M, Miao S, Liu X G, et al. Percentage parameter of the movable fluid in ultra-low permeability reservoir and its application[J]. Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University: Natural Science Edition, 2007, 22(2): 96-99(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XASY200702024.htm
[24]	黄兴, 李天太, 王香增, 等. 致密砂岩储层可动流体分布特征及影响因素: 以鄂尔多斯盆地姬塬油田延长组长8油层组为例[J]. 石油学报, 2019, 40(5): 557-567. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201905005.htm Huang X, Li T T, Wang X Z, et al. Distribution characteristics and its influence factors of movable fluid in tight sandstone reservoir: A case study from Chang-8 oil layer of Yanchang Formation in Jiyuan Oilfield, Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2019, 40(5): 557-567(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB201905005.htm
[25]	谢升洪, 李伟, 冷福, 等. 致密砂岩储层可动流体赋存规律及制约因素研究: 以鄂尔多斯盆地华庆油田长6段储层为例[J]. 地质科技情报, 2019, 38(5): 105-114. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201905011.htm Xie S H, Li W, Leng F, et al. Distribution and controlling factors of movable fluid in tight sandstione reservoir: Taking Chang 6 Formation of Huaqing Oilfield Ordos Basin as an example[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2019, 38(5): 105-114(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DZKQ201905011.htm
[26]	时宇, 杨正明, 黄延章. 低渗透储层非线性渗流模型研究[J]. 石油学报, 2009, 30(5): 731-734. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB200905019.htm Shi Y, Yang Z M, Huang Y Z. Study on non-linear seepage flow model for low-permeability reservoir[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2009, 30(5): 731-734(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYXB200905019.htm
[27]	李玉丹, 董平川, 张荷, 等. 低渗透油藏渗透率及启动压力梯度应力敏感性分析[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2016, 23(6): 57-63. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS201606010.htm Li Y D, Dong P C, Zhang H, et al. Stress sensitivity analysis of permeability and threshold pressure gradient in low-permeability reservoir[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2016, 23(6): 57-63(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS201606010.htm
[28]	王磊, 张辉, 彭小东, 等. 低渗透砂砾岩油藏水敏伤害机理与产能评价[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2019, 46(6): 1148-1158. Wang L, Zhang H, Peng X D, et al. Water-sensitive damage mechanism and injection water source optimization of low permeability sandy conglomerate reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2019, 46(6): 1148-1158(in Chinese with English abstract).
[29]	宋子齐, 谭成仟. 灰色理论油气储层评价[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 1995. Song Z Q, Tan C Q. Grey theory of oil and gas reservoir evaluation[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 1995(in Chinese).
[30]	赵加凡, 陈小宏, 张勤. 灰关联分析在储层评价中的应用[J]. 勘探地球物理进展, 2003, 26(4): 282-286. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ200304007.htm Zhao J F, Chen X H, Zhang Q. Application of grey association analysis in reservoir evaluation[J]. Progress in Exploration Geophysics, 2003, 26(4): 282-286(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-KTDQ200304007.htm
[31]	刘吉余, 彭志春, 郭晓博. 灰色关联分析法在储层评价中的应用: 以大庆萨尔图油田北二区为例[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2005, 12(2): 13-15. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS200502004.htm Liu J Y, Peng Z C, Guo X B. Application of grey relation analysis to reservoir evaluation: Taking Bei 2 area, Saertu Oilfield, Daqing as an example[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2005, 12(2): 13-15(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YQCS200502004.htm
[32]	朱兆群, 林承焰, 张苏杰, 等. 改进的模糊-灰色综合评判方法在储层定量评价中的应用: 以苏里格气田苏X井区盒8下亚段低渗透气藏为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2017, 38(1): 197-208. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201701022.htm Zhu Z Q, Lin C Y, Zhang S J, et al. Application of improved fuzzy-grey comprehensive evaluation method to quantitative reservoir evaluation: A case study of the low-permeability gas reservoirs of the lower part of 8th member of the Shihezi Formation in Su X block of Sulige Gasfield[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2017, 38(1): 197-208(in Chinese with English abstract). https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYT201701022.htm